Government in the Macroeconomy: Public Expenditure

Book Name  Macroeconomics (HL Ahuja)

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. What is Public finance?

2. The Importance of Public Finance

3. Fiscal Policy and Equitable Income Distribution

4. Fiscal Policy for Achieving Price Stability

5. Public Expenditure

5.1. Importance of Public Expenditure

5.2. Classification of Public Expenditure

6. Causes of Growth of Public Expenditure

6.1. Wagner’s Law of Increasing State Activity

6.2. Wiseman-Peacock Hypothesis

7. Effects of Public Expenditure on Production and Distribution

7.1. Effect of Public Expenditure on Production

7.2. Effect of Public Expenditure on National Output at Times of Depression

7.3. Public Expenditure and Economic Growth in Developing Countries

7.4. Public Expenditure to Achieve Better Allocation of Resources

7.5. Effects of Public Expenditure on Distribution

Note: The first chapter of every book is free.

Access this chapter with any subscription below:

  • Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
  • Annual Plan (All Subject)
  • Economics (Single Subject)
  • CUET PG Economics + Booknotes
LANGUAGE

Government in the Macroeconomy: Public Expenditure

Chapter – 30

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Alumnus (BHU)

Follow
Table of Contents

What is Public finance?

  • Public finance deals with the income and expenditure of the Government and the methods by which it raises resources to meet public expenditure. It examines taxation, government spending, public borrowing and deficit financing, and their effects on the economy.

  • It studies how government budgets influence major economic objectives such as growth, stability, equity and efficiency, and analyses fiscal policies aimed at achieving price stability, economic growth and more equitable income distribution.

  • The role of public finance has evolved over time depending on economic conditions. Before the Great Depression, its primary function was to raise sufficient revenue to finance essential government activities such as civil administration and defence.

  • Classical economists advocated minimal government expenditure to reduce the burden of taxation and supported the principle of a balanced budget.

  • Public borrowing was generally recommended only for productive purposes, and although borrowing during war was considered legitimate, governments were expected to repay or reduce debt as soon as possible.

The Importance of Public Finance

  • The Great Depression of the 1930s and the Keynesian analysis of it brought a fundamental change in the role of public finance. The classical approach of minimal government and balanced budgets proved inadequate in tackling deep economic crisis.

  • Keynesian economists argued that public finance should play an active role in raising aggregate effective demand to increase income and employment.

  • To combat depression, the Government should increase expenditure and reduce taxes in order to stimulate aggregate demand and revive economic activity.

  • During and after the Second World War, many Western economies faced inflation due to excessive demand. In such situations, public finance was expected to reduce aggregate demand through fiscal measures to control rising prices.

  • Thus, the government budget evolved from being merely a tool for raising revenue to becoming an instrument of economic stabilisation and macroeconomic management.

  • It was realized that government taxation and expenditure policies can significantly reduce economic fluctuations. Balanced budgets are no longer considered essential, and deficit spending is accepted as a tool for restoring economic stability.

  • During depression, public borrowing and increased public debt can raise aggregate demand, income and employment. Thus, deficit budgeting is viewed positively when used to combat recession.

  • Keynes demonstrated that deficit spending has a multiplied impact on income and employment through the multiplier process, activating a depressed economy beyond the initial amount of spending.

  • After the Keynesian revolution, public finance assumed a stabilizing role, focusing on managing aggregate demand rather than merely raising revenue. This modern approach is known as Functional Finance, a term given by A.P. Lerner.

  • In developing countries, public finance has an additional responsibility of promoting economic growth while maintaining price stability.

  • Developing economies face challenges of poverty, unemployment and low growth, requiring public finance to mobilize resources for development and ensure proper allocation.

  • Beyond growth, public finance must also promote equitable income distribution and expand employment opportunities.

  • Thus, in developing countries, public finance serves a broader functional role of ensuring growth, stability, equity and poverty reduction.

Fiscal Policy and Equitable Income Distribution

  • Fiscal policy can be used to achieve equitable distribution of income, which is essential for social welfare and meaningful economic development. Mere growth of national income does not ensure welfare unless its benefits are fairly distributed.

  • Taxation should be structured to redistribute income in favour of poorer sections, thereby reducing gross inequalities in income, wealth and opportunities.

  • However, a balance must be maintained between reducing inequalities and preserving incentives for saving, investment and production. Fiscal measures should not weaken productive effort or discourage enterprise.

  • A well-designed fiscal programme can reconcile the objectives of economic growth and social equity, ensuring both higher production and fairer income distribution.

  • Redistribution through progressive taxation of higher incomes is one method, but it should be complemented by increased public expenditure aimed at welfare.

  • Expanding public expenditure on anti-poverty programmes such as rural public works, employment guarantee schemes, primary education and public health can significantly improve the living standards of the poor.

  • International experience suggests that direct welfare-oriented public spending to raise consumption of the poor is often more effective in promoting equity than relying solely on taxation of the rich.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top