Nature, Aims and the Functions of the State – Ancient India

Chapter – 3

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Alumnus (BHU)

Contact
  • Ancient Indian thinkers viewed the state as a beneficial institution created for protecting human life and achieving higher ideals.
  • Unlike some other philosophies, they did not see the state as a necessary evil; instead, it was valued for maintaining social order.
  • The presence of anti-social elements made danda (force) a necessary function of government, though ideally, its use should be minimal if people follow a righteous life based on a divine code.
  • Both the king and subjects were expected to follow this divine code for achieving peace and prosperity; violations by the king could lead to a loss of allegiance from the subjects.
  • The early Vedic state was tribal, with no fixed territory; it became territorial in the later Vedic period as tribes settled in specific regions.
  • By the later Vedic period, kings were seen as rulers of both their people and territory (rashtra), and emperors were described as rulers of the land bounded by oceans.
  • In the 4th century B.C., the political thought in India recognized the state as an organic unity rather than a loose collection of parts.
  • According to Kautilya and Manu, the seven constituents of the state are king, ministry, territory, resources, forts, military forces, and allies.
  • Modern thinkers identify territory, population, and central government as core state constituents; ancient Indian lists mostly align but do not explicitly mention population, likely because it was considered an obvious element.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top