Chapter Info (Click Here)
Book No. – 26 (Sociology)
Book Name – Sociological Theory (George Ritzer)
What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)
1. Feminism’s Basic Questions
2. Historical Framing: Feminism, Sociology, and Gender
3. Varieties of Contemporary Feminist Theory
3.1. Gender Difference
3.2. Sociological Theories: Institutional and Interactionist
3.3. Gender Inequality
3.4. Gender Oppression
3.5. Structural Oppression
3.6. Feminism and Postmodernism
4. Feminist Sociological Theorizing
4.1. A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge
4.2. The Macro-Social Order
4.3. The Micro-Social Order
4.4. Subjectivity
Note: The first chapter of every book is free.
Access this chapter with any subscription below:
- Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
- Annual Plan (All Subject)
- Sociology (Single Subject)
- CUET PG + Sociology
- UGC NET + Sociology
Contemporary Feminist Theory in Sociology
Chapter – 13

Feminist theory is a generalized, wide-ranging system of ideas about social life and human experience developed from a woman-centered perspective.
Feminist theory is woman-centered in two ways:
It starts from the situations and experiences of women in society.
It aims to describe the social world from the distinctive vantage points of women.
Feminist theory differs from most sociological theories by being the work of an interdisciplinary and international community of scholars, artists, and activists.
Feminist sociologists seek to broaden and deepen sociology by reworking disciplinary knowledge to incorporate discoveries from this interdisciplinary community.
The chapter begins by outlining the basic questions guiding feminist scholarship.
It provides a brief history of the relation between feminism and sociology.
It describes the various types of contemporary feminist theory, emphasizing sociologists’ contributions.
The chapter concludes with an integrated statement of feminist sociological theorizing as it develops from these various theoretical traditions.
Feminism’s Basic Questions
The impetus for contemporary feminist theory begins with the question: “And what about the women?”
Feminist inquiry asks where women are in any social situation, why they may be absent, what roles they play, how they experience situations, and what their contributions and meanings are.
Women are present in most social situations; absence is due to deliberate exclusion, not lack of ability or interest.
Women have played roles different from popular conceptions (not just passive wives/mothers) and have actively created social situations alongside men.
Despite their presence, women’s roles are often less privileged, subordinate, and largely invisible, signaling inequality.
Feminism’s second question is: “Why is all this as it is?” leading to the development of the concept of gender.
Starting in the 1970s, feminists distinguished between biological sex and socially learned gender behaviors (masculinity and femininity), defining gender as a social construction.
The essential qualities of gender remain debated, but most feminist theories agree gender is created through social processes, not nature.
The third feminist question is: “How can we change and improve the social world for justice?”
Feminist theory shares with other critical social theories (Marxism, neo-Marxism, racial/ethnic minority theories, postcolonial theories) a commitment to social transformation and justice.
Patricia Hill Collins highlights that critical social theory tackles questions faced by groups situated differently in contexts of injustice.
Feminist theorists are committed to ensuring their work improves the daily lives of people studied.
As feminist inquiry expands internationally and across diverse backgrounds, a fourth question arises: “What about differences among women?”
Answers emphasize that invisibility, inequality, and role differences among women are deeply affected by social location—including class, race, age, sexuality, marital status, religion, ethnicity, and global context.
Feminist theory is not only about women nor just about gender relations; it parallels Marx’s epistemological achievement by revealing that dominant knowledge reflects experiences of the ruling class.
Feminism reveals that what was taken as universal knowledge actually reflects the perspective of men as “masters”, ignoring the experiences of women who sustain society in subordinated but essential roles.
This relativizes dominant knowledge, transforming sociological understanding by centering previously invisible women’s experiences.
Feminist theory deconstructs established knowledge systems by exposing their masculinist bias and the gender politics underlying them.
To deconstruct knowledge is to uncover that what is presented as natural or universal is a socially constructed product shaped by power relations.
Feminism itself faces internal deconstruction pressures:
Critiques from women marginalized by mainstream feminism (women of color, postcolonial women, working-class women, lesbians) who reveal multiple women-centered knowledge systems opposing hegemonic feminist claims.
Postmodernist critiques challenge gender as an undifferentiated concept and question the individual self as a stable center of consciousness and identity.
These internal challenges primarily impact feminist epistemology and its frameworks for making truth claims.
Historical Framing: Feminism, Sociology, and Gender
Feminism and sociology share a long-standing relationship, with feminism turning to sociology to answer key questions: what about the women, why is it as it is, how to change for justice, and differences among women.
From the start, activist women identified sociology as a source for explanation and social change.
Women sociologists have been central to identifying and conceptualizing gender as a variable distinguishing biological sex from social masculinity and femininity.
Feminism and sociology are both systems of ideas and social organizations—feminism as theory and social movement, sociology as academic discipline and profession.
Despite women’s active involvement in developing sociology, their achievements have often been erased by male-dominated professional elites.
The feminist perspective endures because women’s subordination is nearly universal and they have persistently protested this situation throughout history.
Feminist writing has grown from a thin trickle (1630s–1780) to a significant collective effort expanding in participants and scope of critique.
Feminist writing is closely linked to feminist social activism, which has had waves or “moments” of intense mobilization, especially in Western history.
First Wave feminism (1830s–1920) focused on women’s political rights, especially suffrage (key events: Seneca Falls 1848, Nineteenth Amendment 1920).
Second Wave feminism (1960–1990) expanded goals to economic and social equality, reconceptualizing relations via the concept of gender.
Third Wave feminism responds to critiques from women of color, lesbians, and working-class women toward Second Wave ideas and reflects feminist ideas shaping the 21st century.
Feminist ideas were present when sociology was coined (Auguste Comte, 1830s), and Harriet Martineau played a key role in early sociology, recognized mainly due to Second Wave feminism’s influence.
Feminist women like Jane Addams, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Florence Kelley, and Marianne Weber contributed substantially to early sociology as theorists, methodologists, and activists.
Women of color such as Anna Julia Cooper and Ida B. Wells-Barnett developed important social theory and sociological activism despite racial exclusion.
Gilman introduced the idea of “excessive sex distinction”, an early conceptualization of gender as socially maintained differences beyond biological sex.
From 1920 to 1960, feminist thinking and activism waned due to social crises and the sense of victory from suffrage; women sociologists worked in isolation and continued research on women using frameworks like “sex roles.”
The 1960s resurgence (Second Wave) revitalized feminist sociology with women organizing via the Women’s Caucus and founding Sociologists for Women in Society (SWS) and the journal Gender & Society.
Second Wave feminism led to unprecedented increases of women in sociology as students, scholars, and professionals, with women holding leadership positions beyond their proportional representation.
Central achievement of Second Wave feminism: establishing gender as a core sociological concept, a social construction classifying people/behaviors as masculine or feminine.
Gender as a variable carries a normative commitment to gender equality and explains social inequality via gender discrimination.
Feminist scholarship expanded to include men as well, with contributions from prominent male feminists.
Despite progress, there remains unease about feminism’s impact on sociology; feminist theory is a distinct group often acknowledged but not fully assimilated into dominant sociology frameworks.
Feminist focus on gender may have shifted attention from feminism’s original goals: women’s liberation and articulating social reality from women’s experiences.
The study of gender is important but not identical to feminist theory’s full project.
This awareness helps explain newer feminist theoretical developments like intersectionality, sexual difference theory, and the persistence of materialist/socialist feminism.