TOPIC INFOCUET PG (Philosophy)

SUB-TOPIC INFO  Philosophy (Section II: Epistemology)

CONTENT TYPE Short Notes

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. Definition and Characteristics of A Priori Knowledge

2. Historical Background

3. Rationalism vs. Empiricism

4. Examples and Scope of A Priori Knowledge

5. Contemporary Challenges and Debates

6. Conclusion

Note: The First Topic of Unit 1 is Free.

Access This Topic With Any Subscription Below:

  • CUET PG  Philosophy
  • CUET PG Philosophy + Book Notes
LANGUAGE

Apriori Knowledge

(Epistemology)

CUET PG – Philosophy (Notes)

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Alumnus (BHU)

Follow
Table of Contents

In epistemology, the philosophical study of knowledge, a priori knowledge refers to knowledge that is justified independently of experience. The term a priori, from Latin meaning “from the earlier,” contrasts with a posteriori knowledge, which is dependent on empirical observation or sensory experience. The concept of a priori knowledge plays a critical role in understanding the nature of reason, the foundations of logic and mathematics, and the structure of justification in human cognition. It raises fundamental questions about how knowledge can be necessary, universal, and independent of empirical content, and it has been central to debates between rationalists and empiricists throughout the history of philosophy.

Definition and Characteristics of A Priori Knowledge

A priori knowledge is defined as knowledge that is justified without recourse to sensory or experiential data. It is often associated with necessity, universality, and logical certainty. Examples include:

  • Mathematical truths (e.g., 2 + 2 = 4)
  • Logical propositions (e.g., if all humans are mortal and Socrates is human, then Socrates is mortal)
  • Conceptual truths (e.g., all bachelors are unmarried)

These propositions are known to be true independently of empirical verification, meaning that their truth value does not depend on the state of the external world. This distinguishes a priori knowledge from a posteriori knowledge, which requires observation or experience (e.g., “The sky is blue,” “Water boils at 100°C at sea level”).

A priori knowledge is often linked to analytic propositions, statements whose truth depends solely on the meanings of their terms, such as “All triangles have three sides.” However, this connection is complex and has been deeply questioned in modern philosophy.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top