TOPIC INFO (CUET PG)
TOPIC INFO – CUET PG (Philosophy)
SUB-TOPIC INFO – Philosophy (Section IV: Symbolic Logic)
CONTENT TYPE – Short Notes
What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)
1. Introduction
2. Inductive Reasoning
3. Relation between Inductive Reasoning and Deductive Reasoning
4. Arguments against Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
5. Types of Inductive Arguments
Note: The First Topic of Unit 1 is Free.
Access This Topic With Any Subscription Below:
- CUET PG Philosophy
- CUET PG Philosophy + Book Notes
Inductive Logic
(Symbolic Logic)
CUET PG – Philosophy (Notes)
Introduction
Logic is the science of reasoning, helping differentiate correct reasoning from incorrect.
It provides methods, tools, and techniques for analyzing how conclusions are drawn.
Reasoning involves forming inferences, where conclusions are derived from assumed true propositions.
A piece of reasoning is structured as an argument consisting of premises (facts, assumptions, evidences) and a conclusion.
There are multiple ways to reason from information, each with specific strengths and limitations.
Based on the relationship between premises and conclusion, reasoning is classified into two types:
Deductive reasoning:
Conclusions follow with logical certainty from premises.
Common in mathematical proofs and formal systems.
Inductive reasoning:
Conclusions are probable, based on observations and experience.
Observations are incomplete, so conclusions lack absolute certainty.
Closely resembles the scientific method.
Corresponding to these forms of reasoning, there are two types of logic: deductive logic and inductive logic.
Both types of logic aim to establish criteria for distinguishing right reasoning from wrong.
Logic, reasoning, inference, and argument are interrelated and sometimes used interchangeably in the context of induction and deduction.
Deductive logic focuses on certainty, whereas inductive logic focuses on likelihood based on evidence.
