TOPIC INFO (CUET PG)
TOPIC INFO – CUET PG (Philosophy)
SUB-TOPIC INFO – Philosophy (Section IV: Symbolic Logic)
CONTENT TYPE – Short Notes
What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)
1. Introduction
2. Kinds of Fallacies
2.1. Formal Fallacies
2.2. Informal Fallacies
3. Kinds of Informal Fallacies
3.1. Fallacies of Ambiguity
3.2. Fallacy of Equivocation
3.3. Fallacy of Amphiboly.
3.4. Fallacy of Accent
3.5. Fallacy of Composition
3.6. Fallacy of Division
3.7. Fallacies of Relevance
3.8. Fallacies of Defective Induction
3.9. Fallacies of Presumption
Note: The First Topic of Unit 1 is Free.
Access This Topic With Any Subscription Below:
- CUET PG Philosophy
- CUET PG Philosophy + Book Notes
Informal Fallacies
(Symbolic Logic)
CUET PG – Philosophy (Notes)
Introduction
Gottlob Frege, a key 19th Century logician, stressed the job of a logician is to distinguish correct reasoning from flawed reasoning and identify how language can mislead thought.
A fallacy is an error in reasoning where premises fail to support the conclusion. Example:
“This man is not intelligent because he cannot run fast” is fallacious—speed isn’t logically linked to intelligence.
Logic uses axioms to govern arguments, and violating them results in fallacies and invalid arguments.
Example of formal fallacy:
P1: All whales are mammals.
P2: X is a mammal.
C: X is a whale.
That conclusion is invalid—not all mammals are whales—highlighting a formal fallacy, i.e. error in argument structure.
This unit focuses on informal fallacies, which arise from content-based errors, often linked to language use.
Everyday language introduces ambiguity, imprecision, and obscurity, resulting in informal fallacies.
Causes of informal fallacies:
Incomplete context understanding.
False assumptions or misinterpretations.
Distraction, bias, or emotional influence.
Overgeneralization without adequate evidence.
Preconceived notions/prejudices.
Importance of logical awareness: helps in identifying and avoiding such reasoning errors.
Caution: Not all seemingly fallacious language—like sarcasm, metaphor, or irony—indicates flawed logic; context matters.
