Book No.001 (Political Science)

Book Name An Introduction to Political Theory (OP Gauba)

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. NATURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS

2. CONCEPT OF RIGHTS

2.1. MEANING OF RIGHTS

2.2. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE RIGHTS

3. CONVENTIONAL THEORIES OF RIGHTS

3.1. THEORY OF NATURAL RIGHTS

3.2. THEORY OF MORAL RIGHTS

3.3. THEORY OF LEGAL RIGHTS

3.4. HISTORICAL THEORY OF RIGHTS

3.5. SOCIAL WELFARE THEORY OF RIGHTS

4. SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PERSPECTIVE

4.1. LASKI’S THEORY OF RIGHTS

5. MARXIST PERSPECTIVE

5.1. CONCEPT OF RIGHTS

5.2. RIGHTS UNDER THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM

5.3. RIGHTS UNDER THE SOCIALIST SYSTEM

6. GENESIS OF HUMAN RIGHTS

7. UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

8. SCOPE OF HUMAN RIGHTS

8.1. RIGHT TO LIFE

8.2. RIGHT TO PROPERTY

8.3. CIVIL LIBERTIES AND DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS

8.4. SOCIAL-ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL RIGHTS

8.5. CONCLUSION

9. THEORIES OF HUMAN RIGHTS

10. THREE GENERATIONS OF RIGHTS

10.1. FIRST-GENERATION RIGHTS

10.2. SECOND-GENERATION RIGHTS

10.3. THIRD-GENERATION RIGHTS

11. DEBATE ON STATUS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS

11.1. ISSUE OF THE DEBATE

11.2. MEANING OF CULTURAL RELATIVISM

11.3. A CRITIQUE OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Note: The first chapter of every book is free.

Access this chapter with any subscription below:

  • Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
  • Annual Plan (All Subject)
  • Political Science (Single Subject)
  • CUET PG + Political Science
LANGUAGE

CONCEPT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Chapter – 15

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Political Science (BHU)

Follow
Table of Contents

NATURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS

  • Human rights are rights to which an individual is entitled by virtue of being a human being.
  • Civil, political, and social-economic rights depend on an individual’s status as a citizen of a particular state, whereas human rights are not determined by this condition.
  • The scope of human rights is very wide, setting the standards for the provision and expansion of civil, political, and social-economic rights.
  • When civil, political, and social-economic rights are exhausted, individuals can still seek relief under the umbrella of human rights.
  • Foreigners, refugees, prisoners-of-war, or proclaimed offenders may be deprived of ordinary rights, but human rights will still apply.
  • Human rights constitute the source of all rights for human beings and embody the scheme of ideal rights.
  • They provide the moral foundation of any system of rights and are similar to the concept of justice.
  • As justice determines the principles on which law should be based, human rights set the standards for all other rights.
  • When ordinary rights are reinterpreted in light of human rights, they expand the domain of human welfare.
  • For example, the right to life may include the right to live on uncontaminated land, to breathe in clean air, and to consume clean water.
  • Governments may be held responsible for ensuring these conditions are met.
  • Human rights must be enforced by a state or international tribunal capable of doing so.
  • Anyone claiming human rights must prove themselves law-abiding and submit to the law for appropriate justice.
  • To understand the true nature of human rights, it is important to inquire into the nature of rights in general.

CONCEPT OF RIGHTS

MEANING OF RIGHTS

  • The idea of rights provides an essential tool for analyzing the relations between individuals and the state.
  • The state claims authority over the individual, but when viewed as an instrument of society, its authority should depend on the function it performs.
  • If the state is seen as a means and the individual as the end, the state cannot have absolute authority over the individual.
  • If the state claims authority, the individual must claim rights.
  • An individual owes allegiance to the state and obeys its commands because the state serves his interests.
  • Rights arise from conflicting claims between the individual and the state.
  • Any political theory that says an individual cannot have rights against the state is not a theory of rights.
  • Benefits from the existence of the state do not constitute rights; rights emerge when the state’s authority is limited or when individuals demand a positive role of the state.
  • Philosophers like Hobbes, Rousseau, and Hegel failed to develop a concept of rights, focusing instead on the state’s role in creating conditions for happiness.
  • Absence of rights makes the happiness of individuals dependent on the benevolence of those in power.
  • Without individual rights to curb the state’s authority, the state may become absolutist, authoritarian, or lead to despotism and tyranny.
  • Glorification of the state without mechanisms to limit its authority means the complete subordination of the individual, opening the door to corruption, oppression, exploitation, and injustice.
  • The concept of human rights originated as a protest against oppression by dominant groups.
  • Rights safeguard individuals from the arbitrary use of power by the ruling class.
  • Robert M. MacIver observed that throughout history, the masses have lived in misery and oppression, while dominating groups used power to subjugate others.
  • In modern times, the vision of human liberation has evolved into the concept of human rights.
  • These rights are now sought to be enshrined in constitutions to prevent governments from using their power arbitrarily.
  • MacIver noted that the demand for human rights has shifted from mere protest to the precise demand for legal and constitutional embodiment of specific claims to liberties and opportunities.
  • In essence, rights are claims by individuals to restrict the arbitrary power of the state, secured through legal and constitutional mechanisms.
  • These rights may also include benefits the state provides to improve the quality of life of its citizens.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top