Book No.001 (Political Science)

Book Name An Introduction to Political Theory (OP Gauba)

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. ORGANIC THEORY OF THE STATE

1.1. THE STATE AS A NATURAL INSTITUTION

1.2. THE STATE AS AN ETHICAL INSTITUTION

1.3. A CRITICAL ESTIMATE

2. MECHANISTIC THEORY OF THE STATE: IDEA OF THE SOCIAL CONTRACT

2.1. THEORY OF THE SOCIAL CONTRACT

2.2. THE STATE OF NATURE

2.3. TERMS OF THE CONTRACT

2.4. A CRITICAL APPRAISAL

3. LIBERAL-INDIVIDUALIST PERSPECTIVE

3.1. THEORY OF LAISSEZ-FAIRE INDIVIDUALISM

3.2. EXPONENTS OF THE THEORY

3.3. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

4. WELFARE STATE PERSPECTIVE

4.1. TRANSITION TO POSITIVE LIBERALISM

4.2. EXPONENTS OF POSITIVE LIBERALISM

5. CLASS PERSPECTIVE

5.1. THE STATE AS AN INSTRUMENT OF THE DOMINANT CLASS

5.2. THE STATE AS AN INSTRUMENT OF CLASS EXPLOITATION

5.3. A CRITICAL ESTIMATE

5.4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

6. COMMUNITARIAN PERSPECTIVE

7. POST-COLONIAL PERSPECTIVE

8. GANDHIAN PERSPECTIVE

8.1. NATURE OF THE STATE

8.2. GANDHI AND MARX

8.3. CONCEPT OF SWARAJ

9. FEMINIST PERSPECTIVE

10. PLURALIST PERSPECTIVE

Note: The first chapter of every book is free.

Access this chapter with any subscription below:

  • Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
  • Annual Plan (All Subject)
  • Political Science (Single Subject)
  • CUET PG + Political Science
LANGUAGE

Diverse Perspectives on the State

Chapter – 10

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Political Science (BHU)

Contact
Table of Contents
  • The concept of the state is central to political thought, which is defined as the study of the state’s structure, nature, and purpose.
  • There is a long tradition of political thought, with several thinkers and schools developing ideas on the state from different perspectives.
  • New ideas often criticize or modify old ones, and old and new political theories coexist, unlike natural sciences where old principles are replaced.
  • None of the current political ideas claim absolute authority; their merits and demerits are constantly examined.
  • Understanding diverse perspectives on the state provides valuable insights for dealing with public affairs.
  • Key perspectives include:
    • Organic theory of the state
    • Mechanistic theory of the state
    • Liberal-individualist perspective
    • Welfare state perspective
    • Class perspective
    • Communitarian perspective
    • Post-colonial perspective
    • Gandhian perspective
    • Feminist perspective
    • Pluralist perspective
  • Political theory offers provisional solutions or working formulas, but debate continues as new ideas emerge.

ORGANIC THEORY OF THE STATE

THE STATE AS A NATURAL INSTITUTION

  • The organic theory of the state compares the state to a living organism and individuals to its organs.
  • The existence and worth of individuals depend on the existence of the state, just as the organs depend on the organism.
  • Different groups and classes in society are naturally fit to perform different functions, with some deemed superior.
  • The state is considered a natural institution, essential for human existence as a civilized being.
  • Ancient Greeks believed the state existed for the sake of life and the good life.
  • Aristotle stated that man by nature is a ‘political animal’, and without the state, a person is either a beast or a god.
  • Aristotle’s view: The state is prior to the individual and the family because the whole is prior to the part.
  • A person isolated from society is not self-sufficient and is compared to a part in relation to the whole.
  • The scientific revolution in the 17th century introduced the mechanistic theory of the state, challenging the organic view.
  • By the 18th and 19th centuries, dissatisfaction with the mechanistic theory led to renewed interest in the organic theory of the state.
  • Edmund Burke, a conservative thinker, argued that the state grew like a living organism and could not survive dissection.
  • The state is greater and more complex than its parts, according to Burke.
  • Nationalism in the 19th century portrayed the state as the embodiment of the nation, leading to the idealist theory.
  • G.W.F. Hegel famously stated, “The state is the march of God on earth.”
  • The development of evolutionary theory gave further momentum to comparing the state with biological phenomena.
  • The biological school of political theory likened political institutions to the growth of living beings.
  • The state’s development was seen as increasing differentiation of parts, like a living organism.
  • Some theorists drew parallels between the state and natural man, describing parts like tissues, nutrition systems, circulation, organs (e.g., brain, nerves, heart, muscles, stomach, nose).
  • Bluntschli compared the state to the masculine sex and the Church to the feminine sex.

THE STATE AS AN ETHICAL INSTITUTION

  • The state is an instrument for good life, not just survival, and has a moralizing effect on human life.
  • By performing duties and enjoying rights, individuals can achieve moral excellence within the state.
  • The state is viewed as an ethical institution in the organic theory.
  • The ethical foundation of the state in the organic theory rests on differentiation of functions.
  • Aristotle believes in natural differences between individuals’ capabilities, asserting that some are destined for subjection, while others for rule.
  • Aristotle views slavery as a natural institution, where masters have high virtue and slaves benefit by serving them.
  • The institution of slavery is meant to secure the good life for both masters and slaves.
  • The modern biological school of political theory contributed to the ethical view of the state.
  • The biological school distinguishes between the organic view and mechanistic view of the state.
  • The three essential characteristics of an organism are:
    • Intrinsic relationship between the parts and the whole; parts of an organism cannot exist apart from the whole.
    • Organic unity of parts; an organism grows from within and cannot simply replace parts like a machine.
    • An organism exists as an end-in-itself, while a machine is a means to an external end.
  • The state is viewed as possessing these three characteristics, making it organic in nature.
  • There is an intrinsic relation between man and the state, similar to the relationship between the parts and the whole in an organism.
  • The state is seen as the source of good life for its citizens.
  • Some theorists claimed the state represents the developed form of rational nature of man, calling it a ‘Moral Organism’, ‘Super-organism’, or ‘Organism of Organisms’.
  • The state was sometimes attributed personality, being referred to as a ‘Real Person’ or a ‘Super Person’.
  • Just as the organs of an organism have no independent interest apart from the organism, individuals have no interests separate from the state’s interests.
  • According to organic theory, individuals can have rights within the state but not against the state.
  • True freedom lies in obedience to the laws of the state.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top