Chapter Info (Click Here)
Book No. – 005 (Comparative Politics – Political Science)
Book Name – Democratic Elitism in Mosca and Gramsci (Beyond Right and Left)
What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)
1. Gramsci’s Direct Acquaintance with Mosca’s Works
2. Scientific Objectivity, Philosophical Sophistication, Historical Awareness
3. Relations of Force, Intellectuals, and the Political Party
4. Political Irresponsibility, Extremism, and Legalism
5. Epilogue
Note: The first chapter of every book is free.
Access this chapter with any subscription below:
- Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
- Annual Plan (All Subject)
- Political Science (Single Subject)
- CUET PG + Political Science
Gramsci on Mosca: Methodological and Theoretical Criticism
Chapter – 3

The Prison Notebooks contain three layers of evidence regarding Gramsci’s acquaintance with Mosca and Mosca’s influence on Gramsci.
The most extensive and deepest layer involves conceptual structure of Gramsci’s political theory, and it is deeply buried in the Notebooks.
This layer contains discussions and analyses where there is no explicit mention of Mosca and his ideas, which will be examined in later chapters.
The second layer consists of explicit comments on Mosca, which will be analyzed presently.
The third layer includes three passages providing documentary evidence of Gramsci’s direct acquaintance with Mosca’s major works.
The analysis will begin with this last group of documentary evidence.
Gramsci’s Direct Acquaintance with Mosca’s Works
One passage proving Gramsci’s direct acquaintance with Mosca’s works is found in the notes on the Italian Risorgimento.
Gramsci classifies secondary literature on the subject and pays special attention to nine books and several articles from the fall of the Historical Right in 1876.
These bibliographical references correspond almost exactly to footnotes in Mosca’s Theory of Governments.
This suggests that Gramsci had the second edition of Mosca’s book (1925) when writing his notes on the Risorgimento.
The discovery is credited to Valentino Gerratana, the editor of the critical edition of the Prison Notebooks.
The second Gramsci passage refers to transformism, particularly the assimilation of socialist intellectuals into more moderate institutions in the 1890s.
Gramsci quotes a passage from Guglielmo Ferrero’s 1895 book on reactionary politics, which he attributes to Mosca’s Elements of Political Science (1923).
The long quotation from Ferrero, though provocative, establishes that Gramsci read Mosca’s Elements in prison.
Gramsci may have also been acquainted with Mosca’s Notes on Constitutional Law (1908), which discusses modern European constitutions and the Italian constitution.
Evidence for this includes lists of books Gramsci compiled in 1929, where Mosca’s book is mentioned.
Although it’s uncertain if Gramsci read Mosca’s constitutional law book in prison, it’s likely he did.
Mosca’s book may explain Gramsci’s remarks on the relation between the concepts of state and civil society.
Gramsci gave considerable thought to Mosca’s major works, as indicated by explicit remarks in the Prison Notebooks.
Gramsci’s comments on Mosca are not as frequent or polished as his comments on others like Croce, Bukharin, and Machiavelli.
Nine passages contain direct discussions of Mosca, but only six distinct passages remain after some early notes were expanded and revised.
Gramsci’s remarks can be grouped into three clusters: general methodological issues, general substantive issues, and Theory of Governments.
Gramsci’s comments reveal more about his own thinking than about Mosca’s, as Gramsci approaches others’ views with a theoretical, evaluative, and problem-oriented interest.