Book No.52 (Political Science)

Book Name Political Philosophy  (Richard G. Stevens)

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. Modern Political Philosophy

1.1. Niccolo Machiavelli

1.2. Thomas Hobbes

1.3. John Locke

2. Postmodern Thought

2.1. Jean-Jacques Rousseau

3. The Nineteenth Century

3.1. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

3.2. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels

4. The Twentieth Century

4.1. Friedrich Nietzsche

5. The End of History

Note: The first chapter of every book is free.

Access this chapter with any subscription below:

  • Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
  • Annual Plan (All Subject)
  • Political Science (Single Subject)
  • CUET PG + Political Science
LANGUAGE

Modern Political Philosophy and Postmodern Thought

Chapter – 9

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Alumnus (BHU)

Follow
Table of Contents

Modern Political Philosophy

  • Philosophy originated with the Greeks, starting with Thales around 636–546 BCE, marking the beginning of a new intellectual tradition.
  • Philosophy appeared as a discordant element in Greek cities, countering established opinions and prejudices shaped by poets like Homer.
  • According to Plato’s allegory of the cave, people are immersed in darkness, believing shadows to be the truth, representing the influence of poetry on city-dwellers’ views on good and bad.
  • Philosophy challenged these prejudices, making philosophers appear impious and disturbing to the cities.
  • Anaxagoras (c.500–428 BCE) was the first philosopher prosecuted in Athens for philosophizing.
  • Socrates was another famous example of tension between philosophy and the city, depicted by Aristophanes in the comedy Clouds as an impious figure who corrupted youth.
  • In the comedy, Socrates’ school is destroyed by Pheidippides and Strepsiades, alongside Hermes.
  • During his trial, Socrates blamed envy and slander, rooted in old accusations that he looked into natural phenomena, which were falsely attributed to him by a comic poet.
  • Socrates denied his interest in such matters during the trial, but later admitted to having once studied them, shifting focus to political philosophy.
  • Cicero acknowledges Socrates as the originator of political philosophy, marking a shift from natural philosophy to political concerns.
  • The possibility exists that political philosophy was perfected by Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, based on the idea of human nature and the nature of the political.
  • If human nature and political nature are constant, political philosophy has not evolved but confronted new political circumstances.
  • The introduction of revealed religion (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) might have been a critical moment in political philosophy’s history, presenting a new challenge.
  • Medieval political philosophy may not represent change but a confrontation with revealed religion, where philosophers adapted or evaded this new context.
  • Thomas Aquinas might be seen as adapting political philosophy, making natural law align with Aristotle’s natural right.
  • Averroes might be viewed as evading the challenge, while Maimonides could fit as another example of adaptation.
  • The question arises whether Aquinas’ adaptation of Aristotle introduces a discordant element into political philosophy or simply reconciles it with God.

Niccolo` Machiavelli

  • Chapter Eight on Machiavelli is titled “A Kind of Betrayal,” marking a significant departure from classical political philosophy.
  • Machiavelli offers an alternative to classical political philosophy, representing a straightforward change, not an evolution.
  • He undercuts classical political philosophy, which he views as impractical, and biblical religion, especially Christianity, which he sees as debilitating.
  • Aristotle linked ethical questions with political questions, while Aquinas separated them, but Machiavelli perverts ethics to serve political goals.
  • Machiavelli’s approach separates ethics and politics, making ethics the tool for achieving political objectives without ethical considerations.
  • This is often summarized by the phrase “the end justifies the means,” but for Machiavelli, ends are not judged by any external standard.
  • For Machiavelli, politics is self-contained, with no higher standard to judge it, and Christianity is seen as an impediment to political objectives.
  • He views the Roman gods as beneficial for Romans because they were tailored to Roman purposes, in contrast to the Christian God, which hinders political goals.
  • Machiavelli is the first political philosopher to advocate for change in political philosophy, with a new outlook on human nature and political order.
  • Classical political philosophy focuses on the best regime, human perfection, happiness, justice, and truth, whereas Machiavelli focuses on humans as brutish or clever beings.
  • The primary concern becomes the nature of a political order that accommodates these human traits.
  • Socrates originated political philosophy, Plato expanded it cautiously, and Aristotle turned it into a teachable science.
  • Machiavelli’s ideas awaited wider acceptance, which was eventually facilitated by Thomas Hobbes and his work.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top