TOPIC INFO (UGC NET)
TOPIC INFO – UGC NET (Political Science)
SUB-TOPIC INFO – Comparative Political Analysis (UNIT 4)
CONTENT TYPE – Short Notes
What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)
1. INTRODUCTION
2. NATIONS AND NATIONALISM
2.1. Ancient and Modern Concept of Nationalism
2.2. Characteristics of Nation
3. NATIONALISM: HISTORICAL FORMS
3.1. European Nationalism: The Cases of England, France and Germany.
3.2. England
3.3. France
3.4. Germany.
3.5. Non-European Nationalisms
3.6. Nationalism as. Difference
4. NATIONALISMS: CIVIC AND ETHNIC
Note: The First Topic of Unit 1 is Free.
Access This Topic With Any Subscription Below:
- UGC NET Political Science
- UGC NET Political Science + Book Notes
Nationalism
Comparative Politics (Unit 4)
INTRODUCTION
Nationalism has been one of the most powerful historical forces shaping the self-definition of individuals.
It is a complex phenomenon, with no uniformity in historical experiences or universality of conceptualization.
Different forms of nationalism have emerged due to specific historical conditions and the social structure of each country.
The study of nationalism involves examining the socio-economic and political forces that shape these specific forms.
The broad framework of relationships within which nationalisms can be understood and explained is crucial for understanding their development.
NATIONS AND NATIONALISM
Nationalism refers to the self-definition and self-consciousness of ‘a people’ as a unified entity, with a focus on how people identify as one (e.g., as an ethnic community) and the purposes this oneness serves (e.g., self-determination).
Nationalism involves expressions of solidarity among people and recognition of this solidarity by others.
Scholars of nationalism agree that it involves:
(a) Integration among members of a nation
(b) An idea of the whole (nation) or collective identity
(c) An understanding of membership in the whole and its relationship with other nations.
Nationalism is about the self-definition by a people as a nation, the awareness of their distinctness from other nations, and the imperative from which this self-definition arises.
Social solidarity, collective identity, and a sense of individual self-relationship with the whole are key to a nation’s identity and recognition.
The way social solidarity, collective identity, and political legitimacy interrelate is crucial to understanding nationalism.
Benedict Anderson describes nations as ‘imagined communities’ to conceptualize nationalism, where communities are distinguished by the style or manner in which they are imagined.
Nationalism involves imagining collective identity and social solidarity in specific ways.
Nationalisms vary in content and form, depending on the historical context.
Anthony D. Smith defines nationalism as an ideological movement for self-government and independence for a group that conceives itself as a nation.
The core content of nationalism is the ideal of independence, with the following logical corollaries:
Securing fraternity and equality among co-nationals by integrating them into a homogenous unit.
Unification of extra-territorial co-nationals into a single nation-state.
Stressing cultural individuality and national differentiation.
Economic autarchy and self-sustaining growth.
Expanding the nation-state to maintain international power and status.
Renewing the cultural and social fabric of the nation through institutional changes to maintain international parity.
Nationalist movements select goals from these corollaries based on circumstances.
Recurrent themes in nationalism include:
Communal fraternity, popular sovereignty, self-help, self-purification, roots, and belonging.
A new sense of human dignity in a national state, the ideals of participation, and self-realization through the nation-state.
The return to the communal Golden Age and identification with nature and the ‘natural man’.
Smith identifies three key notions in modern nationalism:
Autonomy (collective),
Individuality,
Pluralism.
These concepts form the modern ideal of independence, with autonomy associated with Kant and collective autonomy stemming from Rousseau and Fichte.
The group should be free from external interference and internal divisiveness, and should set its own rules and institutions according to its needs and character.
The group is self-determining, as its individuality gives it peculiar laws. Only the assembly of all citizens can make laws for the community; no individual or outsider can legislate.