Book No. –  8 (Political Science)

Book Name Indian Political Thought (Himanshu Roy/ M.P. Singh)

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. Economy and Technology

2. Culture

3. Politics

4. Foreign Policy.

Note: The first chapter of every book is free.

Access this chapter with any subscription below:

  • Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
  • Annual Plan (All Subject)
  • Political Science (Single Subject)
  • CUET PG + Political Science
LANGUAGE

Nehru: Ideas of Development  

Chapter – 25

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Political Science (BHU)

Contact
Table of Contents
  • Nehru’s ideas of development were aimed at modernizing Indian society.
  • Modernity is understood as a social process of change, starting with the renaissance, incorporating new technology, creating balanced social relations, and introducing rationality of thought.
  • Modernity has become a metaphor for social progress, associated with the rise of liberalism and capitalism.
  • The process of change is constant and present in all ages, not a one-time phenomenon or event, but an ongoing transformation in large societies, even before the renaissance.
  • Modernity is a combination of:
    • (a) Deliberate policies designed for social change.
    • (b) Passive, subterranean or collateral effects from both intended and unintended social acts over time.
  • Nehru’s modernity was a conscious design for rapid technological and relational (social and institutional) change through state interventions and mass participation.
  • It aimed to shatter or transcend feudal structures and replace them with a holistic democratic structure in India.
  • The ideal future was a classless society, with communism as the final goal, but in the post-colonial context, it was to be a transitional liberal-democratic society.
  • The transitional society was intended to be bourgeois-democracy free from pre-capitalist elements, promoting rapid social mobility and equitable citizenship.
  • It was envisioned as a society governed through active citizen participation, with knowledge imparted through command guidance.
  • Nehru called for a raging campaign to secure popular support and participation, using more effective machineryand a far-reaching outlook.

Economy and Technology

  • Nehru’s development strategy was premised on the rapid development of the bourgeois economy, assisted by state intervention.
  • The bourgeois economy was expanded into rural areas through land reforms, agricultural cooperatives, bank loans, subsidies, and cottage industries.
  • Nehru advocated for scientific and mechanized agriculture, focusing on better ploughs, seeds, manure, and extending credit and market facilities.
  • Intensive cultivation was essential for self-sufficiency and generating a surplus for India’s progress.
  • In urban areas, growth was primarily driven by state-owned capital in key sectors like coal, iron and steel, shipbuilding, telecommunication, atomic energy, and railways.
  • Focus was on growth, which meant enhanced production, industrialization, capital formation, and expanding bourgeois social formation.
  • The state was to control principal means of production and strategic economic points.
  • Planned development aimed to:
    • Pre-determine the objectives of proposed projects.
    • Regulate the market.
    • Prevent crisis from unbridled production.
    • Generate resources for funding projects.
    • Industrialize regions to create uniform capital-labour relations and a market economy.
  • Nehru emphasized scientific management for improving productivity and ensuring non-conflicting capital-labour relations.
  • The goal of planning was controlled growth, balancing agriculture and industry, and maintaining equilibrium between production, consumption, and purchasing power.
  • Nehruvian state, through planned development, created new markets and undermined semi-feudal relations, transforming isolated villages into a homogeneous society.
  • The market fostered interdependence, creating national unity through standardized production processes and economic features.
  • The socialized functioning of production was central to national unity, while the protected market provided opportunities for business, capital formation, and the creation of a new unequal society.
  • This expansion deepened the monetization of social relations and transformed time into money and polity into a corporate organization.
  • Under Nehru, the bourgeois economy expanded, primarily benefitting the business environment, ending the semi-feudal past.
  • It accelerated the formation of monetized social relations and positioned India’s ruling class in the international business arena, balancing economic ties with both power blocs.
  • Nehru’s era was focused on expanding industrial-infrastructural base in the post-colonial economy.
  • Nehru himself remarked that his policies were not socialistic, with only some public sector industries, and emphasized that this was not socialism.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top