TOPIC INFOUGC NET (Sociology)

SUB-TOPIC INFO  Sociology (UNIT I – Sociological Theory)

CONTENT TYPE Short Notes

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. Edward Said

1.1. Introduction

1.2. Defining Orientalism

1.3. The Functioning of Orientalism

1.4. Said’s Methodology

1.5. Critique of Orientalism

1.6. Said’s Afterward to Orientalism

2. Pierre Bourdieu

2.1. Introduction

2.2. Life Sketch

2.3. Theory of Habitus

2.4. Field Theory

2.5. Theory of Capital and Class Distinction

3. Michel Foucault

3.1. Life and Work of Michel Foucault

3.2. Foucault and Power/Knowledge

3.3. Foucault and Ethics

3.4. Defining Ethics as Care of the Self

3.5. Foucault and Feminism

4. Jurgen Habermas

4.1. Jurgen Habermas Post Modernism, Post Structuralism and Post Colonialism

4.2. Jurgen Habermas Theory

5. Anthony, Giddens

5.1. Introduction

5.2. Defining Modernity

5.3. Dynamism in Modernity

6. Manuel Castells

6.1. Manuel Castells-Post Modernism. Post Structuralism and Post Colonialism

7. Post Structuralism and Post Modernism

7.1. Introduction

7.2. Critique of Structuralism

7.3. Post Structural Theory

7.4. Discourse Knowledge and Experience

7.5. Derrida and Deconstruction

7.6. Foucault and the Archaeology of Knowledge

7.7. Jameson and Late Capitalism

7.8. Baudrillard and Post Modernism

Note: The First Topic of Unit 1 is Free.

Access This Topic With Any Subscription Below:

  • UGC NET Sociology
  • UGC NET Sociology + Book Notes

Post Modernism, Post Structuralism and Post Colonialism

UGC NET SOCIOLOGY (UNIT 1)

LANGUAGE
Table of Contents

Edward Said

Introduction

  • Edward Said’s Orientalism is credited with opening the field of Postcolonial Studies and Colonial Discourse Analysis.

  • It persistently links the colonial experience with the Empire, and politics with culture.

  • The work served as an agency for formerly marginalized peoples, allowing the Empire to write back.

  • Orientalism was published in 1978.

  • The book critiques oriental studies, or the construction of knowledge of the Orient by the West.

  • Said faced hostility from scholars of the Orient, who accused him of crossing the line between arts and politics.

  • Despite criticism, many welcomed its iconoclastic violation of boundaries and conventions as liberating and enabling.

  • The book challenged and unsettled received ideas of the Orient and Occident.

Defining Orientalism

  • Said gives three definitions of Orientalism in the Introduction to his book.

  • The first definition: Anyone who teaches, writes about, or researches the Orient (anthropologists, sociologists, historians, philologists) is an Orientalist, and what they do is Orientalism (p.2).

  • This definition highlights the interlinked nature of various disciplines studying the Orient, transgressing academic boundaries.

  • Said argues that academic classifications should be disregarded when the subject is the Orient.

  • The second definition: Orientalism is a style of thought based on an ontological and epistemological distinction between the Orient and usually the Occident (p.2).

  • This broadens the study of Orientalism to include the nature of knowledge and existence itself.

  • The scope expands to include poets, novelists, philosophers, political theorists, economists, and imperial administrators (p.2).

  • This moves Orientalism from purely academic study to the political realm of administration and creative arts.

  • The third definition situates Orientalism in a historical and material context starting from the late eighteenth century.

  • Orientalism is a corporate institution that deals with the Orient by making statements, authorizing views, teaching, settling, and ruling over it (p.3).

  • It is a Western style of dominating, restructuring, and having authority over the Orient.

  • The term corporate institution implies a large group performing multiple functions but acting as a single entity.

  • Orientalism transcends the academy and becomes a system of socio-political domination by the West.

  • Said uses Foucault’s notion of discourse to structure Orientalism as a discursive field uniting diverse materials for study.

  • He argues that European culture has not just imaged but produced the Orient politically, sociologically, militarily, ideologically, scientifically, and imaginatively.

  • The project of Orientalism was undertaken because Europe gained strength and identity by setting itself against the Orient as a surrogate or underground self (p.3).

  • The Occident needed to produce the Orient to define itself as a superior power.

  • Said further defines Orientalism as a distribution of geopolitical awareness involving a geographical distinction (unequal halves: Orient and Occident) and a will or intention to understand (p.12).

  • He concludes that Orientalism is not just a representation but a considerable dimension of modern political-intellectual culture, more about “our” world than the Orient itself (p.12).

  • Orientalism is a dimension of modern Western culture, expressed in politics and academic disciplines, aimed at gaining authority over the Orient.

  • After defining Orientalism’s scope, Said suggests examining how it functions as a discursive field of study.

The Functioning of Orientalism

  • Orientalism functions through a large number of disciplines, interests, practices, and power groups working together without a written contract.

  • Said uses Antonio Gramsci’s idea of cultural hegemony to explain how Orientalism operates effectively.

  • Gramsci distinguishes between civil society and political society.

  • Civil society consists of voluntary affiliations such as schools, families, and unions, where membership is by consent, not coercion.

  • Culture operates within civil society, and the dominant culture exercises cultural leadership, which Gramsci calls hegemony.

  • Said applies the Gramscian notion of cultural hegemony of the industrial West to explain the historical and socio-political production and maintenance of Orientalism.

  • European culture is defined by the central idea of European identity as superior to all non-European peoples and cultures.

  • Orientalism emerges from Europe’s need to define the Other to assert its superiority through a binary of “us” vs. “them.”

  • This binary of Self/Other is dynamic and maintained through a strategy of “flexible positional superiority,” allowing the West to remain superior in various contexts.

  • Europe’s historical ascendancy from the late Renaissance to the present provided the basis for this assertion of cultural superiority.

  • The economic and political situation allowed diverse Western actors to be present in the Orient and to construct knowledge about it with little resistance from the Orient itself.

  • Orientalism linguistically catalogs a wide range of occupations and institutions, including the scientist, scholar, missionary, trader, and soldier.

  • These varied roles—intellectual, religious, business, military—worked towards the common goal of “orientalising” the Orient.

  • Traditionally known relationships such as the trader and missionary followed by the soldier in colonization are reaffirmed, but Said highlights their common collaborative purpose as novel.

  • Emerging academic disciplines like anthropology, sociology, linguistics, race studies, and history supported and justified colonization while maintaining their appearance as pure, apolitical scholarship.

  • All these theories originated within civil society and exemplify Western hegemony over the Orient from the late eighteenth century onward.

  • Said focuses on civil society rather than state institutions such as the army, police, and bureaucracy, which belong to political society and function by domination.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top