Post Modernism, Post Structuralism and Post Colonialism
(Detailed Notes)
Sociological Theory (Unit 1)
UGC NET SOCIOLOGY
Language Choose your preferred language
Post Modernism, Post Structuralism and Post Colonialism
🎨 Reading Colors
Background
Text Color
Table of Contents
  • Edward Said
  • Introduction
  • Defining Orientalism
  • The Functioning of Orientalism
  • Said's Methodology
  • Critique of Orientalism
  • Said's Afterward to Orientalism
  • Pierre Bourdieu
  • Introduction
  • Life Sketch
  • Theory of Habitus
  • Field Theory
  • Theory of Capital and Class Distinction
  • Michel Foucault
  • Life and Work of Michel Foucault
  • Foucault and Power/Knowledge
  • Foucault and Ethics
  • Defining Ethics as Care of the Self
  • Foucault and Feminism
  • Jurgen Habermas
  • Jurgen Habermas Post Modernism, Post Structuralism and Post Colonialism
  • Jurgen Habermas Theory
  • Anthony Giddens
  • Introduction
  • Defining Modernity
  • Dynamism in Modernity
  • Manuel Castells
  • Manuel Castells-Post Modernism, Post Structuralism and Post Colonialism
  • Post Structuralism and Post Modernism
  • Introduction
  • Critique of Structuralism
  • Post Structural Theory
  • Discourse Knowledge and Experience
  • Derrida and Deconstruction
  • Foucault and the Archaeology of Knowledge
  • Jameson and Late Capitalism
  • Baudrillard and Post Modernism

Edward Said

Introduction

  • Edward Said’s Orientalism is credited with opening the field of Postcolonial Studies and Colonial Discourse Analysis.

  • It persistently links the colonial experience with the Empire, and politics with culture.

  • The work served as an agency for formerly marginalized peoples, allowing the Empire to write back.

  • Orientalism was published in 1978.

  • The book critiques oriental studies, or the construction of knowledge of the Orient by the West.

  • Said faced hostility from scholars of the Orient, who accused him of crossing the line between arts and politics.

  • Despite criticism, many welcomed its iconoclastic violation of boundaries and conventions as liberating and enabling.

  • The book challenged and unsettled received ideas of the Orient and Occident.

Defining Orientalism

  • Said gives three definitions of Orientalism in the Introduction to his book.

  • The first definition: Anyone who teaches, writes about, or researches the Orient (anthropologists, sociologists, historians, philologists) is an Orientalist, and what they do is Orientalism (p.2).

  • This definition highlights the interlinked nature of various disciplines studying the Orient, transgressing academic boundaries.

  • Said argues that academic classifications should be disregarded when the subject is the Orient.

  • The second definition: Orientalism is a style of thought based on an ontological and epistemological distinction between the Orient and usually the Occident (p.2).

  • This broadens the study of Orientalism to include the nature of knowledge and existence itself.

  • The scope expands to include poets, novelists, philosophers, political theorists, economists, and imperial administrators (p.2).

  • This moves Orientalism from purely academic study to the political realm of administration and creative arts.

  • The third definition situates Orientalism in a historical and material context starting from the late eighteenth century.

  • Orientalism is a corporate institution that deals with the Orient by making statements, authorizing views, teaching, settling, and ruling over it (p.3).

  • It is a Western style of dominating, restructuring, and having authority over the Orient.

  • The term corporate institution implies a large group performing multiple functions but acting as a single entity.

  • Orientalism transcends the academy and becomes a system of socio-political domination by the West.

  • Said uses Foucault’s notion of discourse to structure Orientalism as a discursive field uniting diverse materials for study.

  • He argues that European culture has not just imaged but produced the Orient politically, sociologically, militarily, ideologically, scientifically, and imaginatively.

  • The project of Orientalism was undertaken because Europe gained strength and identity by setting itself against the Orient as a surrogate or underground self (p.3).

  • The Occident needed to produce the Orient to define itself as a superior power.

  • Said further defines Orientalism as a distribution of geopolitical awareness involving a geographical distinction (unequal halves: Orient and Occident) and a will or intention to understand (p.12).

  • He concludes that Orientalism is not just a representation but a considerable dimension of modern political-intellectual culture, more about “our” world than the Orient itself (p.12).

  • Orientalism is a dimension of modern Western culture, expressed in politics and academic disciplines, aimed at gaining authority over the Orient.

  • After defining Orientalism’s scope, Said suggests examining how it functions as a discursive field of study.

The Functioning of Orientalism

  • Orientalism functions through a large number of disciplines, interests, practices, and power groups working together without a written contract.

  • Said uses Antonio Gramsci's idea of cultural hegemony to explain how Orientalism operates effectively.

  • Gramsci distinguishes between civil society and political society.

  • Civil society consists of voluntary affiliations such as schools, families, and unions, where membership is by consent, not coercion.

  • Culture operates within civil society, and the dominant culture exercises cultural leadership, which Gramsci calls hegemony.

  • Said applies the Gramscian notion of cultural hegemony of the industrial West to explain the historical and socio-political production and maintenance of Orientalism.

  • European culture is defined by the central idea of European identity as superior to all non-European peoples and cultures.

  • Orientalism emerges from Europe's need to define the Other to assert its superiority through a binary of "us" vs. "them."

  • This binary of Self/Other is dynamic and maintained through a strategy of "flexible positional superiority," allowing the West to remain superior in various contexts.

  • Europe's historical ascendancy from the late Renaissance to the present provided the basis for this assertion of cultural superiority.

  • The economic and political situation allowed diverse Western actors to be present in the Orient and to construct knowledge about it with little resistance from the Orient itself.

  • Orientalism linguistically catalogs a wide range of occupations and institutions, including the scientist, scholar, missionary, trader, and soldier.

  • These varied roles—intellectual, religious, business, military—worked towards the common goal of "orientalising" the Orient.

  • Traditionally known relationships such as the trader and missionary followed by the soldier in colonization are reaffirmed, but Said highlights their common collaborative purpose as novel.

  • Emerging academic disciplines like anthropology, sociology, linguistics, race studies, and history supported and justified colonization while maintaining their appearance as pure, apolitical scholarship.

  • All these theories originated within civil society and exemplify Western hegemony over the Orient from the late eighteenth century onward.

  • Said focuses on civil society rather than state institutions such as the army, police, and bureaucracy, which belong to political society and function by domination.

Required Subscription: UGC NET Sociology OR UGC NET Sociology + Book Notes

You cannot copy content of this page

Scroll to Top