Book No. –  8 (Political Science)

Book Name Indian Political Thought (Himanshu Roy/ M.P. Singh)

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. Colonial Encounter and Rammohan

2. The Rationalist Foundations of Reform

3. Constitutionalism: Rights and Justice

4. Conclusion

Note: The first chapter of every book is free.

Access this chapter with any subscription below:

  • Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
  • Annual Plan (All Subject)
  • Political Science (Single Subject)
  • CUET PG + Political Science
LANGUAGE

Rammohan Roy: Civil Rights  

Chapter – 14

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Political Science (BHU)

Contact
Table of Contents
  • William Adam highlighted Rammohan Roy’s passion for freedom, particularly freedom of thought.
  • Rammohan Roy is cherished by enlightened Indians for his contribution to countering foreign contempt of native intellect, symbolizing a response to colonial perceptions.
  • On 5 April 1823, an anonymous correspondent in Calcutta Journal categorized Calcutta’s residents into three groups:
    • Those who preferred ignorance.
    • Those who were content with the status quo under British rule.
    • Those who opposed British rule, challenging superstition and custom.
  • Rammohan Roy would not have identified with any of these categories, especially as he rejected both the first and third groups.
  • Rammohan’s primary quest was epistemological—seeking socially useful sources of knowledge.
  • He accepted British rule as a fait accompli and believed it to be providential.
  • He argued that British liberalism and constitutional practice in India differed from that in Britain, highlighting the gap between precept and practice.
  • Rammohan’s historical location made him a controversial figure: he admired certain aspects of British rule but also critiqued the Mughal polity.
  • Born in a high-ranking Brahmin family in Radhanagar, West Bengal, Rammohan’s family had served the Mughal Empire for generations.
  • He gained a solid education in Indo-Persian culture due to his family’s background.
  • He worked as munshi (private secretary) for European officials like Thomas Woodforde and John Digby.
  • His study of English language and European developments began during his service with the British.
  • Rammohan Roy moved to Calcutta in 1814, where he befriended influential Europeans and invested in business ventures.
  • Over 15 years, he became deeply involved in debates on Hinduism, Christianity, anti-Sati legislation, and a free trade economy.
  • He authored over 60 tracts in English, Bengali, and Sanskrit between 1814-1833, covering topics like metaphysics, gender justice, Hindu laws, and societal issues.
  • He also ran three journals: Bengali Samvad Kaumudi, Brahmanical Magazine, and Mirat ul Akhbar.
  • In 1830, he went to England to advocate for the Mughal Emperor’s pension and counter Hindu orthodoxy’s propaganda against the Sati Regulations.
  • While in England, he engaged with Reform Bill discussions, met philosophers like Bentham, and supported working-class reforms.
  • He also traveled to France and testified before Select Committees in the British Parliament about India’s material and moral conditions.
  • Rammohan Roy passed away on 27 December 1833 after a brief illness.

Colonial Encounter and Rammohan

  • Rammohan Roy’s letter to George James Gordon in 1832 revealed his early political views and an autobiographical fragment.
  • At the age of twenty, he was already familiar with British laws and forms of government.
  • He initially had negative views on British rule but eventually overcame prejudices, believing it would lead to the amelioration of native conditions.
  • He viewed Europeans as more intelligent and steady, contrasting them with Hindus, whom he described as superstitious and miserable.
  • He considered Bengalis to be submissive, loyal even when oppressed by the Mughals, and warned of the potential rise of anti-British sentiment from upper provinces.
  • Despite Bengal’s loyalty to the British, he acknowledged that unaddressed grievances in other regions could undermine British power in India.
  • He praised British rule for providing freedom and security, which Indians had not experienced under Hindu rulers.
  • Rammohan emphasized the providential nature of British rule, calling the British a deliverer of Bengal from Mughal tyranny.
  • He critiqued pre-British rule as regressive, contrasting it with the enlightened British governance.
  • Rammohan Roy accepted the British view of their civilizing mission in India, as reflected in a Times article in January 1831.
  • The historian Rajat K. Ray identified Rammohan with a threefold modernization process:
    1. Consolidation of the traditional high caste landed gentry.
    2. Transformation of a medieval literati into a modern intelligentsia.
    3. Shift from monopolistic trade to free trade imperialism.
  • Rammohan’s belief in free trade as a means for India’s economic modernization was naïve, as it promoted European capital over local industries.
  • At a Calcutta Town Hall meeting in 1829, Rammohan and others supported the free trade movement, tied to British economic interests.
  • Rammohan was influenced by commercial interests, including his own investment in land and speculation.
  • In the Bengal Herald (1829), it was noted that British rule led to rising land prices, the birth of a middling society, and moral freedom.
  • As a beneficiary of the Permanent Settlement, Rammohan believed in the landlord’s authority to improve the peasantry’s condition.
  • Rammohan’s views on the Bengal economy and land question faced criticism from both liberal and conservativequarters.
  • Critics like the Bengal Harakaru accused Rammohan of only representing the interests of zamindars and ignoring peasants.
  • Despite criticism, Rammohan suggested lowering rents and taxing luxuries to support the peasantry.
  • The Samachar Darpan (1831) misinterpreted Rammohan’s stance, accusing him of supporting English landlords in India, which he did not advocate.
  • Rammohan’s error was assuming that profits from European investment would benefit India’s rural economy.
  • Free trade policies helped integrate Indian markets with British capitalism, which hindered India’s economic growth.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top