Realism

John Baylis – International Theory

Chapter – 5

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Alumnus (BHU)

Contact
Table of Contents

Introduction: the timeless wisdom of Realism

  • The story of Realism begins with the critique of idealists or utopian writers from the inter-war period (1919-1939), who focused on understanding the causes of war to find remedies.
  • Realists argue that idealists ignored the role of power, overestimated human rationality, and mistakenly believed nation-states shared common interests.
  • The outbreak of World War II in 1939 confirmed the inadequacies of the idealist approach, leading to a shift towards Realism.
  • A Great Debate occurred between idealists and realist writers like E. H. Carr, Hans J. Morgenthau, and Reinhold Niebuhr who emphasized the ubiquity of power and the competitive nature of politics.
  • Realists emerged victorious in the debate, and Realism became the dominant tradition in the study of international relations.
  • Realism taught American leaders to focus on interests over ideology, seek peace through strength, and recognize that great powers can coexist despite differing values.
  • The theory of Realism that prevailed after World War II is based on a classical tradition of thought, including figures like Thucydides, Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Rousseau, who emphasized the raison d’état or reason of state.
  • Raison d’état emphasizes that the state must pursue power to ensure its survival in a hostile environment.
  • Realists argue that the use of force in statecraft is legitimate, as the survival of the state is never guaranteed.
  • Realists are skeptical of universal moral principles and warn against sacrificing state interests for ethical conduct.
  • Machiavelli argued that state leaders must adhere to a different morality that focuses on political necessity and prudence, rather than traditional virtues.
  • Realists defend a dual moral standard: one for individual citizens and another for state actions in international politics.
  • Realists believe the state itself represents a moral force, as it creates the possibility for an ethical domestic political community.
  • Classical realism shares core elements with modern variants, such as statism, survival, and self-help.
  • Statism refers to the sovereign state as the legitimate representative of the people, and realists view sovereign statesas the central actors in international politics.
  • The anarchy in international politics refers to the lack of a central authority above sovereign states, making survival a key priority.
  • Domestic politics is hierarchical, while international politics operates in an anarchic system where sovereign states consider themselves the highest authority.
  • Realists argue that the priority for state leaders is to ensure the survival of the state, and power is crucial to achieving this goal.
  • States with more power have a better chance of survival. Power is traditionally defined in military strategic terms, but survival remains the core national interest.
  • Self-help is the principle that states are responsible for their own well-being and survival without relying on other states or international institutions like the United Nations.
  • If threatened, states should augment their own power by engaging in actions such as military arms build-up.
  • States facing threats from more powerful states may form alliances to balance the power of the opposing side.
  • The balance of power mechanism ensures no state or coalition can dominate others, exemplified during the Cold Warwith alliances like NATO and the Warsaw Pact.
  • The peaceful end of the Cold War caught many realists by surprise, leading to critiques of Realism for its inability to foresee developments like regional integration and humanitarian intervention.
  • Critics argue that Realism fails to explain the rise of non-state actors, intra-state wars, and the decline of state power in the face of globalization.
  • Realists maintain that their theory explains intra-state conflicts and argue that Realism is a resilient theory that reflects timeless laws of international politics.
  • The survival of Realism is linked to its claim that it embodies laws of politics true across time and space.
  • Despite political changes, realists believe the world still operates according to Realist principles.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top