Book No. –  15 (Sociology)

Book Name Sociology: Themes and Perspective (Haralambos & Holborn)

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. Introduction

2. Social Inequality and Social Stratification

2.1. Stratification Systems

3. Social Stratification A Functionalist Perspective

3.1. Talcott Parsons – Stratification and Values

3.2. Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. Moore – Role Allocation and Performance

3.3. Melvin M. Tumin – A Critique of Davis and Moore

4. Social Stratification -A Neoliberal Perspective

4.1. Peter Saunders – Stratification and Freedom

4.2. A Critique of the Neoliberal Perspective

4.3. Gordon Marshall and Adam Swift – Social Class and Social Justice

4.4. Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett – The Spirit Level

5. Social Stratification – A Marxist Perspective

5.1. Classes

5.2. Class and Social Change

6. Social Stratification – A Weberian Perspective

6.1. Market Situation

6.2. Status Situation

6.3. Social Closure

6.4. Class and Status Groups

6.5. Parties

7. Modern Theories of Stratification

7.1. W.G. Runciman – The Class Structure, Roles and Power

7.2. John Goldthorpe and The NS-SEC Scheme

8. Changes in The British Stratification System

8.1. Changes in The Occupational Structure

8.2. The Changing Distribution of Income

8.3. The Changing Distribution of Wealth

9. Classes in Capitalist Societies

9.1. The Upper Class

9.2. The Middle Class

9.3. The Upper Middle Class

9.4. The Lower Middle Class

9.5. Middle Class or Middle Classes?

9.6. The Working Class

9.7. The Lower Strata

10. Class Identity and Culture

10.1. Pierre Bourdieu – Class and Culture

10.2. Simon Charlesworth – A Phenomenology of Working Class Experience

10.3. Beverley Skeggs – Formations of Class and Gender

10.4. Mike Savage, Gaynor Bagnall and Brian Longhurst

10.5. Geoff Payne and Clare Grew

10.6. Beverley Skeggs

11. Social Mobility

12. Gender and Social Class

13. The Death of Class?

Note: The first chapter of every book is free.

Access this chapter with any subscription below:

  • Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
  • Annual Plan (All Subject)
  • Sociology (Single Subject)
  • CUET PG + Sociology
LANGUAGE

Social Stratification

Chapter – 2

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Alumnus (BHU)

Contact
Table of Contents

Introduction

  • People have long dreamed of an egalitarian society, but such a society has never existed.
  • All human societies, from the simplest to the most complex, have some form of social inequality.
  • Power and prestige are unequally distributed between individuals and social groups, and there are often marked differences in the distribution of wealth.
  • Power refers to the degree to which individuals or groups can impose their will on others, with or without their consent.
  • Prestige relates to the amount of esteem or honour associated with social positions, qualities of individuals, and styles of life.
  • Wealth refers to material possessions defined as valuable in particular societies, such as land, livestock, buildings, money, and other forms of property owned by individuals or social groups.

Social Inequality and Social Stratification

  • Social inequality refers to the existence of socially created inequalities.
  • Social stratification is a particular form of social inequality, referring to distinct social groups ranked in terms of factors such as prestige and wealth.
  • Members of a particular group or stratum have a shared common identity, interests, and a similar lifestyle, which distinguishes them from other social strata.
  • The Hindu caste system in India is an example of a social stratification system.
  • Traditional Hindu society was divided into five main strata: four varnas (castes) and a fifth group, the outcaste (untouchables).
  • Castes were subdivided into jatis or subcastes, each representing occupational groups (e.g., carpenters, goldsmiths, potters).
  • Castes were ranked in terms of ritual purity: the Brahmins (priests) were the highest caste, symbolizing purity, sanctity, and holiness.
  • Untouchables were considered unclean, and their social relationships were affected by this status. They performed degrading tasks and were segregated from the caste system.
  • The hierarchy of power mirrored the hierarchy of prestige based on ritual purity.
  • Brahmins tended to be the largest landowners and were custodians of the law, which was based on their pronouncements.
  • Inequalities of wealth were often linked to those of prestige and power.
  • Although the caste system has been made illegal in modern India, it still influences social dynamics, especially in rural areas.
  • Social stratification involves a hierarchy of social groups with common identity, interests, and a similar lifestyle, resulting in unequal distribution of rewards.
  • Social inequality can exist without social strata. For example, class systems may have broken down in Western societies, but inequalities in wealth, power, and status still persist.
  • There are still great differences in wealth, power, and status in Western society, continuing social inequality.

Stratification Systems

  • Stratification systems often lead to the development of distinct subcultures within each stratum, characterized by unique norms, attitudes, and values.
  • A subculture tends to develop when members of a social group experience similar circumstances and problems that are not common to all members.
  • Studies of class stratification focus on the nature of class subcultures and whether they are as strong as they once were.
  • Pierre Bourdieu’s work has reinvigorated interest in the relationship between class and culture.
  • Subcultures are more distinctive when there is little opportunity for social mobility between strata.
  • Social mobility refers to the movement of individuals between social strata. It can be upward (e.g., moving from working class to middle class) or downward.
  • Closed stratification systems offer little social mobility, while open systems have a relatively high rate of mobility.
  • Closed systems are characterized by ascribed status, where an individual’s position is largely fixed at birth, with little opportunity for change. Caste is an example of a closed system.
  • Open systems allow for achieved status, where individuals can change their social position through talent, hard work, or luck.
  • Class systems provide the possibility of social mobility, allowing some individuals to improve their position.
  • A person’s position in a stratification system can affect their life chances, or the likelihood of obtaining desirable things and avoiding undesirable ones in society.
  • Life chances include access to resources, opportunities, and outcomes that are influenced by one’s social position (e.g., education, healthcare, job opportunities).
  • The concept of life chances applies particularly in the context of Western society.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top