Book No.5 (Historiography – History)

Book Name  Historiography

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

1.1. Selection of Topic for Research

1.2. Requirements of a Researcher

1.3. Collection of Data

2. AVAILABILITY OF SOURCES

2.1. Archaeology.

2.2. Epigraphy.

2.3. Numismatics

2.4. Literary Sources

3. OBJECTIVITY & SUBJECTIVITY IN HISTORY

3.1. Objectivity in Historical Writings

3.2. Need for Objectivity.

3.3. Scope for Subjectivity

3.4. Sources of Subjectivity

3.5. Requisites for Historians to be Objective

4. THESIS WRITING

4.1. Generalizations or Framing a Formula

4.2. Exposition

4.3. Interpretative Method

5. DRAFTING THE THESIS

5.1. Report Writing

5.2. Documentation

5.3. Foot Notes or End Notes

5.4. Bibliography.

5.5. Index

5.6. Other Formalities

5.7. Synthesis or Synthetic Operation

5.8. Grouping of Facts

5.9. Geographical Basis

5.10. Topical Arrangements

5.11. Constructive Reasoning

5.12. Types of Reasoning

6. FOOT NOTES

6.1. Kinds of Footnote

6.2. Split-Footnote

6.3. Use of Footnotes

6.4. Plagiarism

6.5. Quotations in Footnotes

6.6. External and Internal Criticism

6.7. Bibliography.

6.8. Varieties & Forms of Bibliography

Note: The first chapter of every book is free.

Access this chapter with any subscription below:

  • Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
  • Annual Plan (All Subject)
  • History (Single Subject)
  • CUET PG + History
LANGUAGE

Research Methodology

Historiography

Topic – 5

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Alumnus (BHU)

Follow
Table of Contents

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Selection of Topic for Research

  • Selecting a topic for research is of vital importance and must be done with utmost care.
  • Success in historical writing depends on the proper selection of the subject.
  • A wrong choice of topic could result in regret and disappointment.
  • Historical research could focus on:
    • Addition of new data.
    • New interpretation of known data.
    • Subordination of data to a principle.
  • A scholar should aim to discover or unearth something new, a hidden historical truth that hasn’t been researched before.
  • The subject is typically chosen with the assistance of a guide and supervisor.
  • The guide should provide broad outlines about ancient, medieval, and modern periods, as well as political, social, economic history, or biographical studies.
  • Scholars should choose a subject based on their interests, tastes, and aptitudes related to a region, trend, period, person, or institution.
  • The area and period selected should be limited in scope; modern research is specialized in small areas or short periods of time.
  • Research can focus on a historical personality (e.g., Pandit Nehru), a group (e.g., Nadars or Maravars), or an institution (e.g., caste, religion, Panchayat Raj).
  • Researchers working on Ancient India must be able to analyze archaeological sources, decipher ancient scripts, read inscriptions, and understand the Sanskrit language.
  • Those researching the Sangam age must have knowledge of Tamil literature.
  • For medieval period research, scholars need to know Persian, Urdu, and Arabic, and handle inscriptional evidence.
  • Modern period researchers should know English, Portuguese, Dutch, French, and relevant regional languages to handle archival material, such as travel accounts and factory records.
  • A review of new books and bibliographical articles provides clues for choosing a research topic.
  • Subjects of comparative history should be avoided by fresh scholars.
  • The nature of enquiry, study, and practical problems involved will serve as determining factors in choosing the subject.
  • The saying, “When you succeed in choosing the proper subject, your research is half done,” stresses the significance of choosing the right topic.
  • Selecting the topic is of vital importance and must be done with utmost care.

Requirements of a Researcher

  • Research is undertaken to bring out something new, to extend the horizon of knowledge, and contribute original ideas.
  • A scholar needs the aptitude, training, and technical know-how to get interested in the chosen topic.
  • For research in certain periods, adequate training in handling archaeological, epigraphic, and numismatic material is essential. Scholars focusing on the modern period should be proficient in locating and handling archival sources.
  • The research project should be practical, with source material available to the required extent and within reach, without causing undue hardship.
  • The researcher should be able to use the material freely without concern about censorship by the owner or custodian.
  • The size of the research should align with the nature of the study, such as a project report, journal article, master’s dissertation, doctoral thesis, or book publication.
  • Factors like extent of the area, duration of the period, availability of source material, and nature of contents influence the size of the work.
  • The subject chosen must have a central theme, a direction, and a promise of specific conclusions. It should not be disjointed.
  • A thesis should have a unifying theme, based on chronology or a specific social phenomenon (e.g., caste conflict or class struggle), but avoid overly broad topics.
  • The researcher must have a labor of love, a taste for the subject, and the ability to sustain hard work.
  • The researcher should be willing to search for data in unknown areas, overcome obstacles, and possess the iron-will to complete the thesis.
  • Personal honesty and moral integrity are crucial. The scholar should maintain a balance of judgment, avoid exaggeration, and ensure conclusions are supported by evidence.
  • The scholar must not distort or twist evidence, even for literary artistry, and must avoid religious, racial, class, communal, regional, or national preconceptions and prejudices.
  • An alert and mobile mind is necessary. The scholar should respond quickly to new data and keep the mind constantly switched on to the subject.
  • According to Professor K.A. Nilakanta Sastri, the scholar should avoid running into mental grooves and interpret new or old data in the proper light.
  • The researcher should not be in a hurry or hasty to finish work. Patience is key.
  • Patience is the cardinal virtue of a scholar; the quality of work is more important than time taken.
  • In research, the criterion is quality of work, and whether the requisite excellence has been achieved.
  • A historian must acquire practical skills, such as how to collect notes, prepare bibliography, and plan the work.
  • These are preparatory operations before analyzing, verifying, and unifying the data.
  • The historian should know the historical method, which saves time and energy while ensuring quality.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top