Statistics in Psychology – UGC NET – Solved PYQs

SOLVED PYQs UGC NET (PSYCHOLOGY)

Statistics in Psychology

UGC NET PSYCHOLOGY

Research Methodology & Statistics (UNIT 2)

LANGUAGE

Included Topics: Statistics in Psychology: Measures of Central Tendency and Dispersion. Normal Probability Curve. Parametric (t-test) and Non-parametric tests [Sign Test, Wilcoxon Signed rank test, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Friedman]. Power analysis. Effect size.


1. On a Wechsler type intelligence scale, the subject has a deviation IQ 115. What would be his T score (Mean 50, SD = 10)? [JUNE 2015]

(1) 60
(2) 65
(3) 68
(4) 84


2. Which of the following statements are true about the Principal components analysis? [JUNE 2015]

I. Unities (values of 1) are retained in the diagonal spaces of the correlation matrix.
II. The first principal component explains maximum variance.
III. Principle components analysis follows Common Factor Model.
IV. Principle components analysis yields oblique unrotated factors.

Codes:

(1) I and II
(2) I and IV
(3) II and III
(4) I, II and IV


Directions (Q. Nos. 3-7) Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follows:

The most popular method of measuring attitudes is to administer the attitude scale. Although, Bogardus Social Distance Scale (1925) is one of the first attitude scales, a major breakthrough in attitude scaling was made by LL Thurstone who developed the Law of Comparative Judgement (LCJ) and also proposed the three scaling methods-paired comparison, equal appearing intervals and successive intervals. In the paired comparison, every statement/stimulus is paired with every other statement/stimulus.

The computational methods of paired comparison are most extensively developed and use Thurston’s LCI directly for this purpose. Since, the paired comparison method has limitations in scaling large number of statements/stimuli, the two other methods-equal appearing intervals and successive intervals-were developed by Thurstone. The method of successive intervals was computationally laborious in the pre-computer era and hence, it was not so popular. In the classical scaling tradition, Guttmann developed the Scalogram technique and Edwards developed the scale discrimination technique.

Likert’s development of summated ratings represent an Important landmark in attitude measurement. It follows the traditional psychometric model.

Aiken and Groth-Mamatt (2009) pointed out that other scaling techniques, less frequently used for attitude assessment, include Osgood’s semantic differential, Q-sort, magnitude estimation, expectancy value scaling. Facet analysis, multi-dimensional scaling etc.

3. If eleven attitude statements are to be scaled by the method of paired comparison, what would be the number of pairs? [JUNE 2015]

(1) 11
(2) 55
(3) 110
(4) 121


4. In which of the scaling method, item-remainder correlations are frequently calculated? [JUNE 2015]

(1) Equal appearing intervals
(2) Paired comparison
(3) Successive intervals
(4) Summated ratings


5. Read each of the following two statements, Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and indicate your answer using the codes given below: [JUNE 2015]

Assertion (A): In method of equal appearing intervals, median is often used as a measure of scale value.

Reason (R): In normal distribution mean, median and mode are equal.

Codes:

(1) Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(2) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(3) (A) is true, but (R) is false
(4) (A) is false, but (R) is true


6. Which one of the following techniques usually yields multi-dimensional attitude scales? [JUNE 2015]

(1) Summated ratings
(2) Paired comparison
(3) Equal appearing intervals
(4) Scalogram


7. Which of the following techniques is/are well-known for being associated with cumulative scales? [JUNE 2015]

I. Bogardus Social Distance Scales
II. Likert’s Summated Ratings
III. Guttman’s Scalogram Analysis
IV. Osgood’s Semantic Differential

Codes:

(1) Only I
(2) I and II
(3) I and III
(4) II, III and IV


8. In a contingency table, one of the cell has an obtained frequency of 20 and an expected frequency of 30. What would be the contribution of this cell towards the total Chi-square value? [JAN 2017]

(1) 3.33
(2) 5.00
(3) 10.00
(4) 20.00

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
12345678910
(1)(1)(2)(4)(2)(1)(3)(1)(1)(1)
11121314151617181920
(1)(3)(2)(1)(4)(2)(1)(4)(3)(1)
21222324252627282930
(2)(1)(3)(2)(2)(1)(4)(3)(3)(4)
31323334353637383940
(3)(4)(3)(2)(2)(4)(2)(3)(4)(1)
41424344454647484950
(3)(3)(1)(2)(3)(3)(3)(4)(3)(2)
51525354555657   
(3)(3)(2)(3)(3)(2)(2)   

e

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top