The Economic Problem: Scarcity and Choice

The Economic Problem: Scarcity and Choice

Chapter – 1

Harshit Sharma

Alumnus (BHU)

Contact

Knowledge has many branches, and economics is an important and useful one.
The significance of economics has increased in recent years due to its application in controlling inflation, reducing unemployment, and accelerating economic growth globally.
In developing countries like India, economics is used to devise strategies and policies aimed at eradicating want, poverty, and chronic unemployment.
Many contemporary problems, such as food shortages, stagnation, recession, population explosion, and adverse balance of payments, require a solid understanding of economics for effective solutions.
The science of economics is relatively young, being just about two and a half centuries old, and has made remarkable progress in that time.
The book will explain the principles of modern microeconomics and aims to clarify what economics is and what it studies.
Each branch of knowledge has a particular subject matter, with physics focusing on properties of matter and energy, chemistry on the constitution of matter, political science on the nature of state and government, and biology on living organisms.
Beginners often ask, “What is economics about?” To address this, economists have sought to define economics, thereby delimiting its scope and distinguishing it from other fields.
There is significant controversy surrounding the subject matter and proper definition of economics, as noted by J.N. Keynes.
Economics has been defined variously by different economists, partly because it is considered an unfinished science.
The evolution of economic theory and inclusion of new subjects render old definitions inadequate.
A definition in a developing science like economics cannot fully capture its subject matter, which continues to grow and evolve.
From Adam Smith to modern economists like Paul Samuelson, many have attempted to define economics.
Understanding what economics studies can be achieved through examining the problems economists address, primarily arising from the scarcity of resources relative to unlimited wants.
Scarcity forces choices on how to utilize limited resources for maximum satisfaction of wants.
Thus, economics is often defined as the “Science of Scarcity and Choice.”
The subsequent analysis will explore the economic problem and various questions or issues of choice that arise from it.

THE PROBLEM OF SCARCITY AND CHOICE

Economics focuses on achieving and using material requirements to satisfy human wants, which are unlimited.
Productive resources such as land, skilled labor, raw materials, and capital equipment are scarce or limited.
Scarcity of resources leads to the economic problem of how to use them to achieve maximum satisfaction for people.
This problem affects individuals and society as a whole, leading to a struggle for existence and efforts to enhance well-being.
The economic problem is central to all economic systems, whether capitalist, socialist, or mixed.
The scarcity of resources is a fundamental issue, especially evident in developing countries like India, where many live at a subsistence level.
Developed countries like the USA also face scarcity, as their wants continue to outpace their increased resources and production capacity.
The unlimited wants of individuals drive the economic problem, with desires for better food, clothing, education, healthcare, and technology.
Scarcity requires making choices about which goods and services to produce and which wants will remain unsatisfied.
Choice arises from the need to allocate limited resources effectively to maximize satisfaction.
The study of economics provides insights on using and allocating scarce resources efficiently.
Lord Robbins defines economics as the science studying the relationship between ends (wants) and scarce resourceswith alternative uses.
There are four traditional types of productive resources: land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship.
Labor encompasses all physical and mental abilities available for production, measured by time spent working.
Land includes all natural resources provided by nature, such as minerals, water, climate, and forests.
Capital refers to man-made resources of production, including equipment, factory buildings, and tools, which aid in further production.
Money, shares, and bonds are termed financial capital, distinct from real capital, which aids in production.
Entrepreneurship involves the unique ability to initiate and organize production, make business decisions, and introduce innovations.
All economic resources—labor, land, capital, and entrepreneurship—are limited, constraining the quantity of goods and services produced.
There are four main types of output: consumer goods and services, services, capital goods, and raw materials.
Consumer goods are tangible items for direct use, with single-use and durable goods categories.
Services are intangible and provide direct satisfaction, such as education and healthcare.
Capital goods are used to produce other goods rather than for immediate consumption.
Raw materials and intermediate goods support the production of consumer and capital goods.
The transformation of resources into goods and services is known as production.
The market value of all final goods and services produced in a year is referred to as gross domestic product (GDP).

BASIC QUESTIONS AND CENTRAL PROBLEMS OF AN ECONOMY

The scarcity of resources relative to human wants creates various basic economic problems that an economy must address.
These problems are known as central problems of the economy and involve choice by society.
The four central problems are:
1. 1. What to produce?
  2. How to produce?
  3. For whom to produce?
  4. What provision should be made for economic growth?
What to Produce involves deciding which goods and in what quantities should be produced.
The dilemma of choice is illustrated by the phrase “guns or butter,” emphasizing the decision between military and civilian goods.
Societies must choose from numerous consumer goods, balancing between necessities (like food and clothing) and luxuries (like cars and air conditioners).
Allocating resources between consumer goods and capital goods is crucial for economic growth.
After deciding which goods to produce, societies must determine the quantity of each good to produce due to scarce resources.
In a free market economy, the choice of goods and quantities is influenced by the interaction between private firmsand consumers.
How to Produce focuses on the methods or techniques used to produce goods, requiring choices among various production techniques.
Each production technique uses different combinations of resources, such as labor and capital.
For example, cotton cloth can be produced using handlooms (labor-intensive) or automatic looms (capital-intensive).
The choice of production technique depends on the availability and relative prices of factors of production.
Efficient methods must be employed to optimize the use of scarce resources, avoiding inefficiency that sacrifices potential output.
For Whom to Produce addresses the distribution of output among society members.
The distribution of the national product depends on individuals’ money income, which influences their purchasing power.
Inequality in income distribution leads to disparities in access to goods and services.
Income can be earned through work (wages and salaries) or property (rent, interest, and profits).
The distribution of national output is influenced by various factors, including differences in wages and property ownership.
Government policies, such as taxes and subsidies, also affect income distribution.
The distribution of national income remains a contentious topic in economics and politics, with differing views on equity and contribution.
What Provision Should be Made for Economic Growth? emphasizes the need to allocate some resources for future investment rather than solely for current consumption.
Failing to invest can stagnate or decline future living standards and productive capacity.
The need for capital accumulation and technological progress is essential for enhancing future output and living standards.
Sacrificing current consumption to invest in capital goods and research is known as the cost of growth.
Decisions on saving and investment are critical for achieving future economic progress.
The analysis of the first three problems—what, how, and for whom to produce—is a focus of microeconomics.
Microeconomics examines individual consumer behavior, production decisions by firms, and the price mechanisms that determine resource allocation.
It also analyzes how factor prices influence income distribution and the welfare implications of different economic choices.

CHOICE AND OPPORTUNITY COST

Scarcity of resources leads to a problem of choice in economies, as no economy can produce enough goods and services to satisfy all wants.
Societies must decide what goods and services to produce and in what quantities, given their limited resources.
An individual’s income constrains their ability to purchase goods and services, impacting their choices.
Opportunity cost refers to the next best alternative foregone when making a decision, exemplified by choosing to buy movie tickets instead of a book on economics.
The concept of opportunity cost applies to economies as a whole; societies must evaluate the value of alternatives when deciding on resource allocation.
For example, if a government chooses to increase defense spending, it must reduce spending in areas like agricultureor healthcare.
The Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) visually represents alternative production possibilities and choices within an economy.
The PPF illustrates the opportunity set of options available under given constraints like scarce resources and technology.
Assuming a fixed amount of productive resources, the PPF helps illustrate the trade-offs between producing different goods, such as wheat and cloth.
If all resources are allocated to producing wheat, it could yield 15,000 quintals; if entirely to cloth, 5,000 meters could be produced.
Points along the PPF (like A, B, C, etc.) represent different combinations of goods produced, illustrating the trade-offsmade when shifting resources.
Moving from one point to another on the PPF shows the opportunity cost in terms of the quantity of one good sacrificed for another.
The economy operates efficiently at points on the PPF, indicating full employment of resources without waste.
Points inside the PPF represent inefficient use of resources or unemployment, where the economy can increase output by fully utilizing available resources.
Points outside the PPF are unattainable combinations of goods, as they require more resources than are available.
The PPF is also known as the transformation curve because it illustrates how resources are transformed from the production of one good to another.
Choices made regarding quantities of goods produced involve evaluating where to operate on the PPF, affecting overall efficiency and resource allocation.
The Law of Increasing Opportunity Cost states that as production of one good increases, the opportunity cost of producing additional units rises.
Moving from possibility A to B on the Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) requires sacrificing 1,000 quintals of wheat for 1,000 meters of cloth.
As production increases, the opportunity cost becomes higher; moving from B to C requires 2,000 quintals of wheat for an additional 1,000 meters of cloth.
The sacrifice in terms of wheat continues to increase as production shifts from C to D, D to E, and E to F, demonstrating rising opportunity costs.
This principle creates a concave shape for the PPF, reflecting the increasing costs associated with reallocating resources.
The reason for increasing opportunity costs is that economic resources are not perfectly adaptable to alternative uses, known as specificity of resources.
Resources more suited for one good (e.g., land for wheat) become less efficient when used to produce another good (e.g., cloth).
Scarcity, choice, and opportunity cost are illustrated through the Production Possibility Curve.
The PPF boundary depicts scarcity of resources, setting limits on production potential.
A society must operate on or within the PPF due to constraints in resources and technology.
Choices regarding production levels lead to trade-offs, where increasing one good requires sacrificing quantities of another.
For instance, moving from point B to point C on the PPF involves forgoing 2,000 quintals of wheat to gain 1,000 meters of cloth.
An economy can operate inside the PPF when resources like labor or capital are unemployed or idle.
Historical examples, such as the Great Depression, show economies working below the PPF due to high unemployment rates and idle capital.
Productive inefficiency can also cause an economy to operate below the PPF, indicating that resources are not used effectively.
Productive efficiency occurs when more of one good cannot be produced without decreasing output of another good.
Inefficiencies can result from misallocation of resources, such as using skilled labor in unsuitable tasks, leading to lower outputs.
Lack of incentives for managers and producers to optimize output can contribute to productive inefficiencies, causing the economy to operate below its potential.
Economic Efficiency involves producing goods that people most desire at the least cost; it includes both productive efficiency (maximizing output from resources) and allocative efficiency (producing the right mix of goods based on societal preferences).
Allocative Efficiency occurs when resources are used to produce goods that align with the wants of the population; if an economy produces more of goods that are less desired, it lacks allocative efficiency.
An example of allocative inefficiency is the Soviet Union, where the command economy focused on producing military goods over essential consumer items, leading to shortages and economic collapse.
Economic Growth shifts the Production Possibility Curve (PPC) outward, showing an increased capacity to produce more goods.
Growth in productive resources (e.g., land, labor, capital) and advances in technology cause the PPC to shift outward, representing increased potential for producing both goods.
Moving from a point inside the PPC to a point on it reflects fuller employment of resources, while shifting to a new PPC involves growth in productive capacity.
In cases of underutilized resources (e.g., during depressions), policy measures to boost aggregate demand help move the economy from below the PPC to a point on it, thus achieving full employment and higher output.
When fully utilizing resources, further increases in national output require economic growth strategies like capital accumulation and technological advancement.
Capital Accumulation is crucial for growth, particularly in developing countries; however, it often requires reducing current consumption to allocate resources toward capital formation.
Opportunity cost of capital formation is the reduced consumption of current goods, but it enables higher production in the future by expanding productive capacity.
Countries like Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan (Asian Tigers) achieved high growth by prioritizing capital formation, technological progress, and education (human capital).
Recent examples include India and China, where high rates of domestic investment have spurred economic growth; India’s growth rate has averaged 8% per year from 2007–2017, with the goal of reaching 9% to match developed economies by 2050.
Production Possibility Curves are used in welfare economics and international trade theory to illustrate gains from trade and resource allocation.
A higher rate of capital formation accelerates the outward shift of the PPC, enabling faster economic growth and eventually increasing both consumer and capital goods production.
In international comparisons, countries with higher rates of capital accumulation, such as Hong Kong since 1960, have expanded their production possibilities faster than nations with lower rates.