Chapter Info (Click Here)
Book Name – An Introduction to Ethics (William Lillie)
What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)
1. Society as the Background of the Moral Life
2. The Individual and the State
3. Egoism, Universalism and Altruism
4. Theories of Punishment
4.1. The Deterrent Theory
4.2. The Reformative Theory
4.3. The Retributive Theory
Note: The first chapter of every book is free.
Access this chapter with any subscription below:
- Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
- Annual Plan (All Subject)
- Sociology (Single Subject)
- CUET PG + Philosophy
- UGC NET + Philosophy
The Individual and Society
Chapter – 14

Society as the Background of the Moral Life
Ethics is the normative science of human conduct in societies.
Human actions are significant in ethics because they affect other individuals, though actions not affecting others are still ethically relevant.
The life of society is the normal atmosphere and training ground of morality.
Moral ideas develop through association with others and are constantly criticized and modified by others’ opinions.
The objectivity of moral opinions is supported by their general agreement with the opinions of others.
Moral judgements often have a direct social reference, aiming at the satisfaction of others rather than solely oneself.
Morality is generally a social business, except in rare cases like saints or ascetics.
Aristotle: Man without society is either a beast or a god.
Two exaggerations of the social view of morality to avoid:
(a) Subordination of individual good to community good:
If community good = sum of individuals’ goods → may be greater than any individual’s good.
If community good = something beyond individual goods → individual good usually takes priority.
Social goods are largely instrumental, serving the good of individuals.
Institutions (state, college, church) may have some intrinsic value, but it is usually minor compared to individual goods.
Kant: Rational beings are ends in themselves, not means to an abstract society.
(b) Coherence with others’ volitions is not the sole test of moral willing:
Coherence may be a condition of good willing within an individual.
In a perfected community, coherence among wills is likely, but in a developing community, conflict is normal.
Moral reformers often face resistance; reforms may bring conflict rather than peace.
Communities may coherently pursue morally bad policies, making such actions worse (e.g., political or racial persecution).