Book No. –  22 (Western Political Thought)

Book Name The Origins of Totalitarianism (Hannah Arendt)

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. Expansion and the Nation-State

2. Power and the Bourgeoisie

3. The Alliance Between Mob and Capital

Note: The first chapter of every book is free.

Access this chapter with any subscription below:

  • Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
  • Annual Plan (All Subject)
  • Political Science (Single Subject)
  • CUET PG + Political Science
  • UGC NET + Book Notes
LANGUAGE

The Political Emancipation of the Bourgeoisie

Chapter – 5

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Alumnus (BHU)

Follow
Table of Contents
  • The period from 1884 to 1914 separates the nineteenth century (ending with the scramble for Africa and birth of pan-movements) from the twentieth century (beginning with the First World War).

  • This era is known as the period of Imperialism, characterized by stagnant quiet in Europe but rapid developments in Asia and Africa.

  • Some features of this period resemble totalitarian phenomena of the twentieth century, making it a possible preparatory stage for later catastrophes.

  • Despite its proximity, the period still feels part of the nineteenth century, evoking nostalgia as a “golden age of security” where even horrors had some moderation and respectability.

  • This contrasts sharply with later horrors such as concentration camps and death factories, which are far removed from the general atmosphere of this era.

  • The key event in inner-Europe during imperialism was the political emancipation of the bourgeoisie, which until then had economic power but did not seek political rule.

  • The bourgeoisie developed alongside the nation-state, which ruled over a class-divided society.

  • Even as the bourgeoisie became the ruling class, political decisions remained with the state.

  • The conflict between state and society became open when the nation-state could no longer support capitalist economic growth.

  • During the imperialist period, neither the state nor the bourgeoisie achieved a decisive victory in this power struggle.

  • National institutions resisted imperialist brutality and megalomania, and bourgeois attempts to exploit the state’s violence for economic aims were only partially successful.

  • This balance changed when the German bourgeoisie fully backed the Hitler movement, aiming to rule with the mob’s support.

  • However, this came too late; the bourgeoisie destroyed the nation-state but achieved a Pyrrhic victory.

  • The mob proved capable of handling politics independently, ultimately liquidating the bourgeoisie and all other classes and institutions.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top