Theory of Profits

Book No.3 (Economics)

Book Name Principles of Microeconomics (HL Ahuja)

What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)

1. Introduction

2. Profits as a Residual Income

3. Profits as a Dynamics Surplus: Clark’s Dynamic Theory of Profits

3.1. The Various Types of Changes

3.2. Knight’s Views on Dynamic Theory

4. Schumpeter’s Innovations Theory of Profits

5. Risk, Uncertainty and Profits: Knight’s Theory of Profits

5.1. Profits, Unpredictable Changes and Uncertainty

5.2. What Causes Uncertainty?

6. Role and Functions of Profits

Note: The first chapter of every book is free.

Access this chapter with any subscription below:

  • Half Yearly Plan (All Subject)
  • Annual Plan (All Subject)
  • Economics (Single Subject)
  • CUET PG + Economics
LANGUAGE

Theory of Profits

Chapter – 43

Picture of Harshit Sharma
Harshit Sharma

Alumnus (BHU)

Contact
Table of Contents

Introduction

  • After analysing rent, wages, and interest, economics examines profits, which are generally regarded as the reward for enterprise, the fourth factor of production; however, economists have long differed on the nature, origin, and role of profits, and no complete agreement has emerged regarding their true source.

  • The theory of profit has remained one of the most confused and controversial areas in economics, largely because economists disagree about the proper function of the entrepreneur.

  • One view considers the entrepreneur as the organiser and coordinator of the other factors of production; according to this approach:

    • Profits are earned for performing organisational and coordinating functions.

    • Enterprise is treated as a special type of labour.

    • Profits are regarded as a special form of wages.

  • Another view sees the entrepreneur as the bearer of risk and uncertainty because he controls the business and makes decisions regarding price and output; profits arise as compensation for bearing the possibility that these decisions may prove incorrect due to future business changes.

  • Joseph Schumpeter assigned the entrepreneur the role of an innovator and explained profits as the reward for introducing innovations into the economic system.

  • F.H. Knight emphasised uncertainty as the fundamental source of profits, arguing that the entrepreneur earns profits because he bears uncertainty inherent in economic activity.

  • Some economists treated profits as a form of non-functional income rather than as a reward for entrepreneurial functions:

    • J.M. Keynes associated profits with favourable movements in the general price level.

    • Joan Robinson, E.H. Chamberlin, and M. Kalecki linked profits to imperfect competition and monopoly.

  • According to the monopoly-based explanation:

    • The greater the degree of market imperfection or monopoly power, the greater the profits earned by entrepreneurs.

    • Profits are therefore connected with the ability to exercise market power rather than with entrepreneurial functions alone.

  • Different economists identified different primary sources of profits:

    • F.H. Knight → Uncertainty-bearing.

    • Schumpeter → Innovation.

    • Hawley → Risk-bearing.

    • Joan Robinson, E.H. Chamberlin, and M. Kalecki → Monopoly power and imperfect competition.

  • The passage argues that profits actually arise from multiple sources simultaneously, including uncertainty, innovation, risk-bearing, and monopoly power; consequently, no single theory of profit provides a complete explanation because each overlooks some important determinants of profits.

  • B.S. Keirstead advanced a more comprehensive view by arguing that profits originate from:

    • Monopoly or monopsony power.

    • Successful innovations.

    • Correct estimation of uncertain future conditions, whether specific to a particular industry or affecting the entire economy.

  • According to Keirstead, profits may exist as rewards for monopoly or monopsony advantages, for innovation, and for accurately anticipating uncertain future events, making profit a multifaceted phenomenon rather than the product of any one single factor.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

You cannot copy content of this page

Scroll to Top