TOPIC INFO (UGC NET)
TOPIC INFO – UGC NET (Political Science)
SUB-TOPIC INFO – Political Theory (UNIT 3)
CONTENT TYPE – Short Notes
What’s Inside the Chapter? (After Subscription)
1. INTRODUCTION
2. BACKGROUND: KAUTILYA AND THE MAURYAN EMPIRE
3. KAUTILYA: HIS WORK AND HIS TIMES
4. KAUTILYA’S VIEWS ON STATE
4.1. Swami or the King
4.2. Amatya or the Minister
4.3. Janpada or the People
4.4. Durga or the Fort
4.5. Kosha or Treasury
4.6. Danda or Sena or Coercive Power of State (Armed Forces. Secret Service and Police)
4.7. Mitra or Ally/Friend
5. Kautilya on War
6. Kautilya on Justice
7. Kautilya on Diplomacy
7.1. The Mandala Concept
7.2. Six forms of Diplomacy.
8. Comparing Kautilya
8.1. Kautilya and Plato
8.2. Kautilya and Machiavelli
9. Conclusion
Note: The First Topic of Unit 1 is Free.
Access This Topic With Any Subscription Below:
- UGC NET Political Science
- UGC NET Political Science + Book Notes
Kautilya
Indian Political Thought (UNIT 3)
INTRODUCTION
Kautilya, an ancient Indian political thinker, was a multi-dimensional personality known for his famous work, Arthashastra.
Arthashastra is studied across various disciplines like political science, international relations, diplomacy, security studies, economics, management, and public administration.
Kautilya is regarded as one of the finest ministers and politicians in India.
His views on politics and the state continue to resonate in contemporary India, though it is believed that his works have not received enough attention in India or internationally.
The science of statecraft had been developing in India even before Kautilya, and he did not claim to be a pioneer in this field.
Kautilya compiled famous works and theories that were preceded by other scholars, providing his own views on areas like politics, economy, and diplomacy.
There were at least four distinct schools and thirteen individual teachers of Arthashastra before Kautilya.
Kautilya’s masterpiece, Arthashastra, likely superseded previous works, rendering them redundant and leading to their disappearance.
It is important to study Kautilya’s work to understand its resilience through the centuries and its contemporary relevance for India.
BACKGROUND: KAUTILYA AND THE MAURYAN EMPIRE
Kautilya was the minister in the kingdom of Chandragupta Maurya from 317 – 293 B.C. and is regarded as one of the shrewdest ministers of his time.
He explained his views on State, War, Social Structures, Diplomacy, Ethics, Politics, and Statecraft in his book Arthashastra.
The Mauryan Empire was one of the largest empires in Indian history, expanding from the Indian Ocean to the Himalayas and Iran in the west.
Kautilya was a key advisor to Chandragupta Maurya, who established the empire after Alexander’s departure from India.
Before Kautilya, there were other philosophers in India who composed the Shastras, but Kautilya’s work was more robust and encompassing, incorporating earlier treaties.
The paper highlights Kautilya’s thinking in the East, which predates Machiavelli’s “The Prince” and emphasizes its relevance today.
Kautilya’s ideologies on state, statecraft, and ethics are viewed as realistic and highly applicable in the modern context.
His work on diplomacy is seen as underrepresented in the Western world, making it important to analyze his contributions in this area.
Kautilya’s views cover four key dimensions: War & Peace, Human Rights, International Economic Justice, and World Order.
In comparison, figures like Bismark and Woodrow Wilson only demonstrated views on two of these dimensions.
Kautilya’s political realism emphasizes the primacy of the State, with the King carrying out duties to preserve the state.
His work describes the brutal and gory means a king must adopt to remain in power, reflecting his realist approach.
This contrast in ideologies may explain why Ashoka, the grandson of Chandragupta Maurya, renounced violence and war, embracing the path of Dharma or Morals.
The paper focuses on Kautilya’s thoughts on war, diplomacy, and ethics.
A section compares Kautilya with philosophers like Plato and later discusses why Machiavelli’s work seems abridged and succinct in comparison to Kautilya’s extensive work.
Kautilya’s work is analyzed in the light of today’s politics and ethics.
Max Weber, in his lecture “Politics as a Vocation,” stated that Machiavelli’s work is harmless compared to Kautilya’s Arthashastra.